From Cultural Diplomacy to Cultural Transnationalism: The Contribution of Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums to the Evolving Narratives of Culture and Histories
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Galleries, libraries, archives, and museums (GLAM) are key institutions in shaping and articulating collective narratives of identity, culture, history, and society. A retrospective view of GLAM’s global history reveals a wide range of dynamics, approaches, and ideas about their role in producing and communicating these narratives. Historically, GLAM institutions have been shaped by dominant powers and often served as vehicles for reinforcing prevailing cultural and societal narratives. However, they also act as platforms for alternative practices, fostering efforts to rebalance public discourse on culture, identity, and history. This knowledge synthesis aimed to highlight the critical importance of GLAM institutions in fostering intercultural relationships. While significant literature addresses their involvement in cultural diplomacy—particularly their role in facilitating state-level diplomatic relationships through cultural exchange—this project sought to focus on five key objectives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.036 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.021 | 0.016 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.019 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".