Entre o Potencial de Transformação Local e os Entraves do Programa de Aquisição de Alimentos na Cidade de Viçosa-MG
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neste trabalho, buscou-se explorar entraves que impedem que o agricultor familiar aumente sua renda pelo Programa de Aquisição de Alimentos (PAA), vinculado ao Programa Fome Zero, do Governo Federal. Discute-se a importância da agricultura familiar e o fomento de políticas públicas para seu fortalecimento, pois com apenas um quarto da área produtiva do país produzem cerca de 40% do total dos alimentos (IBGE, 2009), valor essencial para manter os avanços que reduziram de 14,9% para 6,9%, de 1990 e 2012, o percentual de subnutridos no país (FAO, 2012). Baseando-se entrevistas, a abordagem qualitativa trouxe a percepção de que o maior entrave se refere à falta de apoio gerencial, em contraposição ao benéfico suporte técnico à produção feito pela EMATER. Também há duplicidade da oportunidade do PAA com o Programa Nacional de Alimentação Escolar (PNAE). Espera-se contribuir à gestão do PAA e estimular políticas públicas de combate à realidade de miséria e fome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".