MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6926227009 · doi:10.18739/a2b56d65b

Bias-Corrected Gridded Soil Temperatures (North of 30°N) Between 1982-2023 at 0.05° Resolution

2025· dataset· en· W6926227009 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueCalifornia Digital Library · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicPsychometric Methodologies and Testing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPermafrostModerate-resolution imaging spectroradiometerMean squared errorSoil waterSnowmeltSnowLinear regressionVegetation (pathology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ECMWF Reanalysis 5th Generation Land (ERA5-Land) and Famine Early Warning Systems Network Land Data Assimilation System (FLDAS) both provide gridded soil temperatures globally at a resolution of ~9 kilometers (km). However, ERA5-Land soil temperatures exhibit warm biases over permafrost regions, and a median Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of between 1.6 Kelvin (K) and 2.3K, while FLDAS exhibits cold biases, and a median RMSE of between 2.5K and 4.5K. Thus in an uncorrected form, their soil temperatures are unsuitable for permafrost applications, or as boundary conditions for hydrological models. Here we investigated the use of a hierarchy of bias-correction techniques including mean bias subtraction (MBS), multiple linear regression (MLR), and random forest regression (RF) to bias-correct ERA5-Land and FLDAS soil temperatures. The MLR and RF models incorporated 10 predictors including soil depth, soil temperatures, 2 meter (m) air temperatures and snow water equivalent (SWE) from the reanalysis product, Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), the month of the year, as well as geospatial information such as elevation, latitude and longitude. MLR and RF models were used to predict the observed soil temperature for each grid cell, and metrics were compared against in-situ soil temperature measurements from 2686 stations. It was found that RF greatly outperformed MBS and MLR, providing an average RMSE reduction of between 46 percent (%) to 77% relative to the uncorrected product soil temperatures. This dataset accompanies Herrington, T., Erler, A. and Fletcher, C. (in Review), Theoretical and Applied Climatology. It includes two datasets of 0.05° bias-corrected gridded soil temperatures over the extratropical northern hemisphere for all land areas north of 30 degrees North (°N). The first dataset includes bias-corrected ERA5-Land soil temperatures for each of the Hydrology Tiled ECMWF Scheme for Surface Exchanges over Land (HTESSEL) model layers, between 1981-2023. The second dataset includes bias-corrected FLDAS soil temperatures for each of the Noah LSM model layers, between 1982-2023. The bias-correction utilizes random forest regression and 10 predictors including soil depth, the reanalysis soil temperature, sine and cosine transformations of the month of the year, the reanalysis air temperature, MODIS NDVI, reanalysis snow water equivalent (SWE), along with elevation, latitude and longitude.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.141

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.179
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCalifornia Digital LibrarySame topicPsychometric Methodologies and TestingFrench-language works237,207