MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6926244221 · doi:10.20381/ruor-22257

Thermochronologic and Geophysical Investigations of Canadian Cordilleran Crust

2018· article· en· W6926244221 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueuO Research (University of Ottawa) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicrobial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLithosphereGeodynamicsCrustTectonicsGeothermal gradientCretaceousOceanic crust

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lithospheric-scale geodynamic processes are interconnected with surface processes such as erosion and tectonic denudation, therefore the integration of geological and geophysical data is valuable when developing geodynamic models. One geodynamic problem that has gained worldwide interest is the contrast in lithospheric properties between the hot and thin Canadian Cordillera and cold and thick North American craton. This thesis focuses on characterizing two aspects of the crust in western Canada: 1) ancient surface and near-surface processes using low-temperature (U-Th)/He thermochronology; and 2) modern geothermal gradients using a wavelet analysis of magnetic anomalies. The first study resolves a differential, tectonically-driven Cretaceous exhumation history in the northern Canadian Cordillera. The second study finds that Curie depths (~580 °C) are shallow throughout the Cordillera, averaging ~15 km, compared to the Canadian Shield, averaging ~33 km. Both studies provide useful constraints for modeling the geodynamic evolution of the Canadian Cordillera.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueuO Research (University of Ottawa)→Same topicMicrobial Natural Products and Biosynthesis→French-language works237,207→