Ductility in FRP rods for concrete reinforcement by interfacial shearing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Non-corrosive reinforcement of concrete provides great potential for reducing life cycle costs (LCC) of highway infrastructure (bridge decks and columns, light-standards, dividers) and concrete structures near water (piers, retaining walls, platforms). This is especially important in areas where salts are common (cold weather road salting, coastal regions) and is achieved by extending the life of structures and the period between major repairs. Costs of infrastructure rehabilitation due to corrosion of reinforcement are estimated to be $1.2 billion dollars in Ontario in the next few years, and up to 40% of all annual infrastructure costs in the province of Quebec. Efforts to reduce the frequency of repair and replacement of ageing structures include using epoxy coating of the reinforcing bar (rebar), cathodic protection, alternate types of steel and fibre reinforced polymer (FRP) rebar. Of these, FRP rebar appears to be the most promising. The limitation of FRP rebar is the low maximum strain and linear behaviour up to failure. Prior attempts at increasing the ductility and producing non-linear behaviour have had limited success. Maximum strain remains limited to that of the highest strain fibres available. Pseudo-ductility has been achieved by combining multiple fibre types having different material properties. The work described in this thesis focussed on non-traditional methods for achieving ductility in FRP rebars by taking advantage of the frictional interface of two materials. Two methods were tested. The first employed a solid inner-core with an over-wrap cut at regular intervals and relied on the rebar pulling out of the concrete at sustained load. Rods were tested in concrete beams under bending loads. Sustained load was achieved for significant pull-out. The second method combined continuous fibres with discontinuous meso-rods wherein the continuous fibres provide initial stiffness and maximum strength and the discontinuous meso-rods provide high-ductility via fibre pull-out. A concept model using aligned short steel fibres was manufactured and tested. Load-displacement behaviour showed substantial local elongation. Prototype models using carbon fibres were manufactured and tested. Specimens showed evidence of fibre pull-out. Future specimens should employ an intermediate material with a controlled and repeatable shear strength for the interface.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".