MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6926428092 · doi:10.25446/oxford.13742260

E00147: The Epic Histories, traditionally attributed to P'awstos, written in Armenian in the second half of the 5th c., recount the miraculous disappearance in a river, of the Syrian anchorite *Šałitay (Syrian anchorite and disciple of Daniel, S00067), who wished to avoid the veneration of his relics. Written in Armenia in the second half of the fifth century.

2014· other· hy· W6926428092 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Oxford · 2014
Typeother
Languagehy
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacillus and Francisella bacterial research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThroneEPICOrder (exchange)ArmenianQuarter (Canadian coin)Heaven

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Epic Histories, Book V, Chapter 25-26: Šałitay was a saintly man who dwelt in the great mountain known as the Throne of Anahit. Together with another anchorite, Epip'an, he had witnessed the spirit of Patriarch Nersēs being lifted to Heaven. Šałitay's fame was widely spread and he was known for performing miracles and healing wild beasts who suffered injuries, he was known for crossing rivers with his shoes remaining completely dry. He would normally wander about alone but sometimes he would come down to an inhabited locality and would heal many of the sick. Բայց ամենայն մարդ սպասէր եւ ակն ունէր մահու նորա, վասն ըմբռնելոյ զմարմին նորա: Իսկ սուրբն Շաղիտա իմացեալ զայս` թէ սպասեն առնուլ զմարմին նորա բազում մարդիկ, ապա խնդրեաց Շաղիտա յԱստուծոյ, զի մի' ոք ըմբռնեսցէ զմարմին նորա: Եւ եղեւ օր մի յաւուրց, որպէս սովորութիւն էր իւր, գնալ ի վերայ ջուրցն գետոյն: Եւ մինչ դեռ անցանէր նա ընդ գետն Կորդուաց, ըստ խնդրուածոցն իւրոց` որպէս եւ խնդրեաց նա, յանկարծակի` իբրեւ կայր ի մէջ գետոյն` յանկարծօրէն ընդ ջրովն մտեալ սուրբն Շաղիտայն ծածկեցաւ: Եւ մեծ գոյժ եղեւ գաւառին. եւ ժողովեցան անչափ բազմութիւնք մարդկանն ի մի վայր եկեալք կուտեցան, մինչեւ հատին դարձուցին ընդ այլ շրջեցին զգետն: Եւ խնդրէին զմարմինն սրբոյն Շաղիտայի, եւ ոչ կարացին ուրեք գտանել. զի իւր խնդրուածքն առ Աստուած այսպէս էին լեալ յառաջագոյն, սոյնպէս եւ կատարեցաւ: 'He was very old, and everyone awaited and watched for his death in order to seize his body. But Šałitay perceived this: that many men waited to seize his body, and so he implored God that no one should take his body. And it so happened, one day, that he was walking as was his custom over the water of the river. And while he was crossing the river of Korduk', unexpectedly as he was standing in the middle of the river, Šałitay suddenly entered into the water and was hidden from sight, as he had implored in his supplication. And there was much lamentation in the district. A countless multitude of men assembled, cut off and moved the river to another bed, and searched for the body of St Šałitay, but they were unable to find it anywhere. For his earlier request to God that it should be so, had thus been fulfilled.' Text: Garsoïan 1984, 31-37; Translation: Garsoïan 1989, 205.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.223

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0670.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of OxfordSame topicBacillus and Francisella bacterial researchFrench-language works237,207