MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6926428280 · doi:10.25384/sage.c.4671551

Navigating severe maternal morbidity using big data: Green, yellow, and red flags for researchers

2019· other· en· W6926428280 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSage Journals Data · 2019
Typeother
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFermentation and Sensory Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaternal morbidityPsychological interventionPregnancyMyocardial infarctionPerinatal mortalityMaternal deathStroke (engine)DiseaseMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Severe maternal morbidity (SMM) is a concept initially developed to identify cases of near-miss, for quality of care audit. Definitions vary, but include medical conditions (e.g., acute myocardial infarction and sickle cell crisis), obstetric complications (e.g., eclampsia, amniotic fluid embolism), organ failure, and therapeutic interventions (e.g., hysterectomy, mechanical ventilation, massive transfusion). SMM has also become an endpoint for studies of maternal morbidity and mortality. As mortality is fortunately uncommon, this surrogate endpoint, comprising a composite of various life-threatening conditions and life-sustaining interventions, plays an important role in research and surveillance. SMM has become a composite of conditions (indicators) that are identifiable from health administrative databases. Unfortunately, like maternal death, SMM is gaining prevalence1—about 13 to 15 per 1000 births in Canada, and 11 to 16 per 1000 births in the US.2

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.025
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.113
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.225

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0250.113
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0060.012
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0150.015
Open science0.0030.008
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0670.037

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.357
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.043 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSage Journals DataSame topicFermentation and Sensory AnalysisFrench-language works237,207