MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6926522645 · doi:10.2312/cr_m66

SUBFLUX, Cruise No. 66, August 12 - December 22, 2005, Las Palmas (Spain) - Talcahuano (Chile)

2009· report· en· W6926522645 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueHelmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR) · 2009
Typereport
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHistory of Computing Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForearcSubductionCruiseMeteor (satellite)Current (fluid)Deep water

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The R/V METEOR M 66 cruise was carried out primarily in support of the "SFB" 574 (Volatiles
\nand Fluids in Subduction Zones), a Cooperative Research Center dedicated to understanding the
\nbudget, reactions, and recycling of volatile elements in subduction zones and their role in climate
\nforcing. To address the short- and long-term variability of the Earth’s climate, the geochemical
\nevolution of the hydrosphere and atmosphere, and related processes that are all connected to the
\nreturn flow of volatiles and fluids from subduction zones, the SFB 574 is studying the Central
\nAmerican forearc off Costa Rica and Nicaragua (Fig 1).
\nThe goals of the initial, oceanographic leg of cruise M 66 were to obtain part of a 2-year time
\nseries of the transport of southern hemispheric water through the passages into the Caribean, to
\nstudy the circulation and variability of the flow in the deep western boundary current and in the
\ninterior of the basin, and to calculate time scales of deep water spreading from the Labrador Sea
\nto 16°N.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0100.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHelmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR)Same topicHistory of Computing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207