SUBFLUX, Cruise No. 66, August 12 - December 22, 2005, Las Palmas (Spain) - Talcahuano (Chile)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The R/V METEOR M 66 cruise was carried out primarily in support of the "SFB" 574 (Volatiles \nand Fluids in Subduction Zones), a Cooperative Research Center dedicated to understanding the \nbudget, reactions, and recycling of volatile elements in subduction zones and their role in climate \nforcing. To address the short- and long-term variability of the Earth’s climate, the geochemical \nevolution of the hydrosphere and atmosphere, and related processes that are all connected to the \nreturn flow of volatiles and fluids from subduction zones, the SFB 574 is studying the Central \nAmerican forearc off Costa Rica and Nicaragua (Fig 1). \nThe goals of the initial, oceanographic leg of cruise M 66 were to obtain part of a 2-year time \nseries of the transport of southern hemispheric water through the passages into the Caribean, to \nstudy the circulation and variability of the flow in the deep western boundary current and in the \ninterior of the basin, and to calculate time scales of deep water spreading from the Labrador Sea \nto 16°N.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".