MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6926572157 · doi:10.25446/oxford.25932190

Thomas Paxton - The After Effects of War

2024· other· en· W6926572157 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicrobial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNephew and nieceSpanish Civil WarWorld War IIQueen (butterfly)Wife

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thomas "Tucker" Paxton lived at 342 South Frederick Street, South Shields. He was captured in the early stages of the war when he was in a tank that was blown up, resulting in a broken leg. He was sent first to Stalag 20B at Marienburg, Poland, then to Stalag 8A, just south of the town of Görlitz on the Polish border. He sent many letters from the POW camp to his parents.When he returned from the war, his niece Lynn Wilson was told by her father: "He was very unsettled. He couldn't stay in one job. He couldn't settle into a job or a life. He got married quickly to a relative's sister-in-law. The marriage didn't last. He went to Canada to try and find work. He wasn't there long. He'd come back. He couldn't settle down into anything, but eventually he did. He moved to Hastings and worked in Hastings and stayed there and married again and settled down there and that was it. He never once spoke about the war, ever."When he returned, he was extremely emaciated, and his mother died shortly after his return, which made it difficult for him to adjust to post-war life.Transcription attached.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.424

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1270.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→Same topicMicrobial Natural Products and Biosynthesis→French-language works237,207→