My Husband Freddie (Frederick) Trinder, Bomber Command, Mid-Upper Airgunner & Wireless Op, Oxfordshire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
My name is Janet Trinder (nee Blake). Freddie was my husband. I didn't know Freddie until long after the War. I chased him. I met him at the Planning Office in Telephone House in Oxford alongside my dad in the 1950s. We courted for 10 years before we got engaged. My dad was a Senior Planning Engineer. Freddie spent six years and seven months in the Forces (RAF, Bomber Command) and he was 25 years old when he came out of the Forces in September 1946 after having completed 38 bombing raids over enemy territory. After the War, he worked for a while at the Production line of British Layland (in Oxford) and went on to the Post Office. Freddie worked in the Planning Group at the Post Office. I was a Drawing Office Assistant (a 'Tracer') for the same area that Freddie produced. I just fell for him 'like that'. As a part of a 5-man flying crew, Flight Lieutenant Freddie Trinder of 214 Squadron first flew in a Hampden aircraft which weren't serviceable enough, so then transferred to flying in a Halifax and a Stirling. Because it was a 5-man crew, that meant one person had two jobs. Freddie was a mid-upper airgunner and wireless op.See photos of Freddie as a young man. Freddie is 18 or 19 years old in the photo. He volunteered in the RAF very early as he was keen to fly (Read his text on "My Story. Thoughts and Life as a member of Bomber Crew"). See photo of RAF Prayer before a Mission, The King's Christmas Broadcast 1939, Author, Louise Haskins. The prayer that was recited by the RAF crew before boarding aircraft prior to bombing. Freddie completed 38 flying missions. See group photos dated May and June 1946 with signatures.See photo of Freddie's National Health & Pension members card 1936-1937
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.536 | 0.288 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".