MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6926588456 · doi:10.21949/1518154

Comparative Study of Motor Carrier Services Programs

2012· report· en· W6926588456 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueROSA P · 2012
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicParasite Biology and Host Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Department of Transportation
KeywordsMotor carrierVariety (cybernetics)EnforcementLaw enforcementHuman servicesCarrier signal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Motor Carrier Services Division of the Montana Department of Transportation commissioned this study to provide factual, comparative information about the motor carrier programs of nine selected jurisdictions, focusing on the manner in which those jurisdictions deal with the mixture of regulatory and enforcement responsibilities with which they are faced. Information included in this report was obtained through written surveys, on-site visits with motor carrier program personnel in each of the study jurisdictions, and research on motor carrier program topics through a variety of sources. Study jurisdictions included Alberta, Canada; Arizona; Colorado; Idaho; Nebraska; North Dakota; Texas; Washington; and Wyoming.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.375
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueROSA PSame topicParasite Biology and Host InteractionsFrench-language works237,207