MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6926646548 · doi:10.25446/oxford.25912669

Bill Gibson - "A Tour of My Life in the Royal Air Force 1942 - 1945"

2024· other· en· W6926646548 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicrobial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrewMeaning (existential)Christian ministryMidnightFront (military)Launched

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

My Father, William Gibson, was a London policeman. Although this was a reserved occupation, in 1942 he volunteered to join the RAF, at a time when things were going badly. He was posted to Canada where no doubt he had a good time, and learned to fly, although ended up as a Navigator.Once back in England he was posted to 170 Squadron and flew in Lancaster’s in the later part of the war, his last ‘op’ being to drop bread over Holland. From the navigators position in the aircraft, he could not see out, although he told me that once when it was ‘all happening’ he moved his position so that he could see out, and what he saw was so terrifying, he never looked out again. He was fortunate enough to come through without a scratch, although they did have several ‘incidents’. One entailed the crew having to ‘pee’ into the hydraulics reservoir after airborne repairs, so that they could lower the landing gear. Another time they landed with no brakes, overshot the end of the runway, crossed a road and a field and ended up in a farmyard. Another time, somebody forgot to remove the cover from the pitot tube, meaning they had no idea of how fast they were flying. They had to land the plane at a high speed, so that they could be sure they were above the stalling speed. My Father was very critical of the Air Ministry with regard to the use of large, slow planes, saying that two Mosquitoes could carry the same bomb load as a Lancaster, used the same number of engines, 3 less crew, and due to their high speed, reduced size and manoeuvrability, were rarely shot down. He felt many lives could have been saved if more Mosquitoes had been produced instead of the heavy bombers. The attached photos are from a scrap book my Father kept, illustrating his experiences during both training and hostile operations. The newspaper cuttings relate to ops he went on. The last photo shows a greeting card with a picture of a painting that was sold by The Royal Air Forces Association, and although the artist painted a typical Lancaster, the identification lettering he painted on the aircraft, happened to be that of the aircraft my Father flew in. Rodger Gibson.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1200.046

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→Same topicMicrobial Natural Products and Biosynthesis→French-language works237,207→