MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6926666188 · doi:10.25318/1110005601-fra

Les déclarants à revenu élevé, au Canada, seuils régionaux particuliers

2019· dataset· fr· W6926666188 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueStatistics Canada Dissemination · 2019
Typedataset
Languagefr
FieldEnergy
TopicAlgal biology and biofuel production
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEarned income tax creditUnjust enrichmentInequality

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce tableau présente les parts de revenu, les seuils de revenu et les parts d’impôts des déclarants particuliers canadiens, ainsi que les chiffres totaux; l’accent est mis sur les peronnes à revenu élevé (95 % du seuil de revenu, 99 % du seuil, etc.). Les seuils de revenu sont propres à la géographie. Par exemple, le nombre de Néo-Écossais dans le 1 % supérieur est calculé comme le nombre de Néo-Écossais déclarants dont le revenu total dépasse 99 % du seuil de revenu des déclarants néo-écossais. Différentes définitions de revenu sont fournies dans le tableau, notamment sur le revenu du marché, le revenu total et le revenu après impôts, avec et sans gains en capital.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.157

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.013
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStatistics Canada Dissemination→Same topicAlgal biology and biofuel production→French-language works237,207→