MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6926671895 · doi:10.24442/boristheses.1847

Italiano e dialetto fra percezione e produzione nei bambini

2020· dissertation· it· W6926671895 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBORIS Theses (Bern Open Research Information System) (Bern University Library, Hochschulstrasse 6, 3012 Bern, Switzerland) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageit
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacillus and Francisella bacterial research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeNeuroscience of multilingualismComprehensionGrammarSet (abstract data type)CognitionPerceptionItalian languageFirst language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent studies have shown that bilingualism might influence cognitive functions other than language. The goal of this study is to detect if these advantages are also for those bilinguals speaking Italian, (national language) and dialect (local language). The research project examines developmental patterns in the narrative skills of Italian children. The research investigates a longitudinal sample of 22 children speaking only Italian (I), and 26 children speaking Italian and dialect (ID). In the first session children are in Grade 1 of two Primary schools in southern Italy; the second session, set one year later, use the same procedure of the first session, but there is an additional questionnaire about the perception of the two languages by the children. The results of this questionnaire show that there are still misconceptions about language diversity: dialect is still considered a stigma. Data are gathered by using a narrative assessment tool: the child tells a story created by ENNI (Edmonton Narrative Norms Instrument), which involves story formulation from visual material only. Afterwards, children participate in comprehension task involving the same pictures to assess Story Grammar knowledge, Complexity Index, First mentions. Results show that ID’s performances are slightly better than those of I’s ones. A part from the presence of more colloquialisms and regionalisms in ID’s productions, the results of both groups are the same:the cognitive level of the children don’t differ regardless the language used. In both groups’ productions is evident the failure of bilingualism of Italian and dialect: the languages used are semi-languages, mixed, lacking their own independence. Italian and dialect seem to oppose and phagocitise each other provoking the failure of bilingualism. Children have learnt a language already mixed instead of two different languages. Dialects have always been considered as not-languages, instead of being preserved, provoking the slow loss of dialects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBORIS Theses (Bern Open Research Information System) (Bern University Library, Hochschulstrasse 6, 3012 Bern, Switzerland)Same topicBacillus and Francisella bacterial researchFrench-language works237,207