MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6926698451 · doi:10.25394/pgs.28902104

<b>Tar Spot of Corn: Recent Insights and an Interpretable Weather–Imagery Pipeline for Disease Prediction</b>

2025· dissertation· en· W6926698451 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePurdue · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicrobial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPathosystemtar (computing)Pipeline (software)Artificial neural networkPredictive modellingPhenomicsFeature selectionLogistic regression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tar spot of corn, caused by Phyllachora maydis (Maubl.), is characterized by black, tar-like lesions. The pathogen can reduce photosynthetic capacity, causing premature senescence and yield losses. After a decade in the U.S., P. maydis has resulted in an estimated loss of 937,000 bushels of corn in the U.S. and Canada. Now five years since the first review of tar spot, our understanding of this pathogen has substantially increased. Herein, the first section is a review of the recent advancements in knowledge of pathogen biology, inoculation protocols, modeling, and disease management, addressing ongoing challenges in tar spot dynamics. In the second section, an experimental pipeline comparing logistic regression and neural networks for interpretable tar spot prediction was explored. Current single-source models might fail to capture the full range of pathosystem variability, potentially leading to error biases and inaccurate predictions. Accordingly, we explored an innovative approach using multi-source data (weather and vegetation indices) to predict 1% tar spot severity at the ear leaf using neural networks (NN) and logistic regression (LR) models. Experiments conducted in Indiana (2021-2022) gathered 791 disease observations, 52 variables from multispectral images, and 90 weather station variables. Five modeling experiments were evaluated using different data sources, feature selection methods, and model performance. We used SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to enhance NN interpretability. Results showed NNs models outperformed LR in accuracy and specificity, particularly with vegetation indices (94.4% accuracy). LR models demonstrated higher sensitivity (96.1%) with weather data, suggesting strong prediction of tar spot at 1%. While data fusion showed inconsistent performance improvements, SHAP analysis and logistic regression pinpointed the minimum temperature during the night and relative humidity during the day, as well the standard deviation of Renormalized Difference Vegetation Index (RDVI) and Triangular Vegetation Index (TVI) as critical predictors. Future research should expand datasets across multiple locations, refine predictive thresholds, standardize disease assessment methods, and further integrate remote sensing technologies to enhance practical disease management applications to safeguard corn productivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePurdueSame topicMicrobial Natural Products and BiosynthesisFrench-language works237,207