MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6926744378 · doi:10.25446/oxford.25912798.v1

Training pilots in Canada

2024· other· en· W6926744378 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicrobial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraining (meteorology)CommonwealthWork (physics)TigerJob trainingSchedule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Talking about her father Gerald CrokerGerald was born in 1910 and had been in Australia, expecting to stay there. He returned to the UK due to his mother's ill-health and worked in the Insurance industry.By 1940 he was learning to fly. In June 1941 he was posted to Canada as a flying instructor. His log books have survived. These details all the different planes he flew, the type of training and the pupils he taught. These were pilots from all over the Commonwealth and the UK. He felt he hadn't had the same experience as others because he hadn't had to fight. The planes included Tiger Moths, Oxfords and Dakotas. He was based in Calgary, Alberta throughout the war.In 1945 he was seconded to what was the start of BOAC covering Nairobi, South Africa, Iraq and the Middle East.In 1948 he had a non-flying accident at Herne airport (hit on the head by a swing door) that resulted in a detached retina.His new area of work was to set up wool shops in southern England (he turned down a ground job in Cairo). There was a quick turnover of trainees in Canada. On returning to the UK they would go on conversion courses for the planes they would be flying on active service. He did conversion courses himself.He collected photos of his time in Canada and the UK. These were of individuals, groups, planes and places. He also collected postcards. These and his log books are available to be copied for the archive. The record also includes his passport. Had a large picture of a Mosquito (plane). The log-books include his own training in Tiger Moths and Oxfords. By July1941 he was training others. Included RCAF Flying School No 3.By 1944, he was back in the UK flying Ansons, Wellingtons and Walrus from Prestwick. He went on a B.AT. course (This was a Blind Approach Training course - a fixed narrow radio beam gave out a continuous tone signal when the aircraft was correctly in line with the runway, dots and dashes were heard on either side when flying off line. The pilot had to keep the aircraft flying along this line of continuous tone until he reached the airfield and was able to land.)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.298

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0200.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0460.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshare→Same topicMicrobial Natural Products and Biosynthesis→French-language works237,207→