(Orange County section) -- Yorba Linda feature, 1961
Bibliographic record
Abstract
12 images. (Orange County section) -- Yorba Linda feature, 31 May 1961. Scenes of buildings and overall scenes of Yorba Linda.; Supplementary material reads: "Yorba Linda feature art. By Dorene Parsons. This roll contains: Below. Exclusive Los Angeles Examiner photos by Dorene Parsons. 1-2-3: Old Bank of America, corner of Main Street and Lemon Drive, Yorba Linda. 4-5: Modern U.S. Post Office, Yorba Linda, on Lemon Drive, near corner of Main Street and about 1000 feet from old Bank of America on other side of street. 6-7: Beautiful new Yorba Linda Library, which cost about $100,000, located south side of Lemon Drive bordered by Olinda and Plumosa Avenues. 8-9: March (yes, that's her name) Butz, Librarian 13 years, who is retiring on June 30, 1961, photographed with the 5 scrapbook volumes she and the Library Board have compiled on Yorba Linda, which are the only actual books available with chapters on the library, the Yorba family, favorite sons and daughters of Yorba Linda, history of Yorba Linda, photographs, clippings, etc. Mildred Yorba MacArthur has assisted with information on Yorba family. (Etc.) Butz gets most of the credit, however".; Supplementary material continues: "...Main Street, Yorba Linda, (street scene) which is the main street of Yorba Linda small town street scene, quiet and sleepy looking. 10-11-12: The beautiful fashionable Yorba Linda Country Club which is beautifully backgrounded by famous California hills. It is an out-of-this-world mecca for recreation".
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.823 | 0.591 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".