MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6926847541 · doi:10.25656/01:10306

L'enseignement de la grammaire et de l'écriture au secondaire québécois. Principaux résultats d'une recherche descriptive

2013· article· fr· W6926847541 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuepeDOCS · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicStreptococcal Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerspective (graphical)Context (archaeology)Ivory towerSimple past

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pour combler le manque de données sur l’enseignement du français au secondaire québécois, la recherche ÉLEF (État des lieux de l’enseignement du français au secondaire québécois) a procédé à une enquête par questionnaires auprès d’un échantillon d’enseignants de français et d’élèves de 4e et de 5e secondaire ainsi qu’à l’analyse de dix séquences de cinq à huit cours de français. Les chercheuses ont constaté, d’une part, que le portait dressé ressemble à celui brossé par la recherche menée par le Conseil de la langue française en 1985 et, d’autre part, que ni les prescriptions des programmes d’études ni les recherches en didactique du français ne semblent avoir beaucoup influencé les pratiques enseignantes observées. (DIPF/Orig.)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.570
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it