Bibliographic record
Abstract
23 images. Airport in Ontario, 9 December 1956. General views.; Caption slip reads: "Photographer: Forbes. Date: 1956-12-09. Reporter: T.T. Assignment: Pacific Airmotive; Chino. Special instructions: A. Monday. 01/02: L-R - Production line at Pacific Airmotive Corp., Chino. 87/88: F-86 fighters in hangar at Pacific Airmotive Corp. Chino. 145/146: Mechanics work on fuselage of F-86 fighter at Pacific Airmotive, Chino. 34: Roy Striker, sheet metal mechanic on inside of F-86 at Pacific Airmotive, Chino. 39/40: F-86 - line at Pacific Airmotive, Chino - planes are waiting to go in hangar for repairs. 107/108: Air Force 'early warning' radar aircraft on repair line at Lockheed Aircraft service, Ontario. 9: More Air Force 'early warning' planes under repair at Lockheed Aircraft Service, Ontario. 201: Air strip to be extended. 97/98: Row of F-84 Thunderjets on leased property of Southern Calif. Aircraft Corporation at Ontario International Airport. 7/8, 03/04: Far shot of Lockheed Aircraft Service overhaul shops at Ontario International Airport. 63/64: General Electric hangars on right -- Lockheed Aircraft Service on left. 10: Albert Gardia hoses down wing tip of F-94 under repair at Lockheed Aircraft Service, Ontario. 203/204: Final inspection flight line - jet fighters - at Ontario International Airport - Lockheed Aircraft Service. 129: General shot of Ontario International Airport".
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.555 | 0.189 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".