Pew Research Center Poll: United Nations/Iraq/Democracy/Islam/United States/Middle East/Political Leaders/SARS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Direction of country (1); U.N. influence on country (1); U.N. role in international conflicts (1); world becoming more connected through greater economic trade and faster communication is good/bad for this country (1); democracy (1); any serious threats to Islam today (1); solidarity with Islamic people living around the world (1); opinion of certain countries (5); opinion of Americans (1); unfavorable view of United States is because of President George W. Bush/America in general (1); international policy decisions (1); views on America (7); boycotting American products (2); boycotting French and German products (2); danger of certain current governments to world peace (3); justification of using military force against countries that may seriously threaten our country but have not attacked us (1); Iraq (7); change in Middle East region now that Saddam Hussein has been removed from power (1); U.S. policies in Middle East (2); state of Israel can/cannot exist so that rights and needs of Palestinian people are taken care of (1); partnership between U.S. and Western Europe/Canada (1); confidence in political leaders to do the right thing regarding world affairs (10); worried that U.S. could become a military threat to country someday (1); Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/SARS (1).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.274 | 0.118 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".