MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6927112764 · doi:10.25625/sq3iag

IMPERIAL METALS CORP DEEPDIVE

2025· dataset· en· W6927112764 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueGöttingen Research Online · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiatoms and Algae Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTailingsStock (firearms)Profit (economics)Copper mineDrillingImperial unit systemGrading (engineering)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<div class="tab-pane active word-break " id="description" style="padding-top:5px;"> <h4>Description</h4> <div id="idea_description_div"></div> <p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 8pt; line-height: 107%; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Aptos, sans-serif;">Long Imperial Metals</p> <p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 8pt; line-height: 107%; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Aptos, sans-serif;">All values are given in CAD unless otherwise stated</p> <p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 8pt; line-height: 107%; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Aptos, sans-serif;"> </p> <p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 8pt; line-height: 107%; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Aptos, sans-serif;">Imperial Metals looks like a dreadful investment. The company has been loss making for 8 of the last 10 years, and 80% lower despite never having paid a dividend. Granted, things haven’t always gone their way, being responsible for one of the largest tailings dam breaches in Canada in 2014. But somewhat unexpectedly, the company will report a decent profit this year and this should only increase in the coming years. Because despite this terrible track record, they have a 30% ownership of one of the most profitable copper-gold mines of the coming decade. And that mine has ample room to grow even larger.</p> <ul> <li><a href="https://www.columbia.edu/~tmd2142/5-best-stock-research-websites.html">best stock research sites</a></li> <li><a href="https://www.columbia.edu/~tmd2142/best-stocks-websites.html">best stock research sites</a></li> </ul> <p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 8pt; line-height: 107%; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Aptos, sans-serif;">Imperial owns 2 active copper/gold mines named Mount Polly and Red Chris, both located in Canada. They both have a pretty interesting future production profile, but most of the value is in Red Chris.</p> <p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 8pt; line-height: 107%; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Aptos, sans-serif;">Red Chris was acquired by Imperial in 2007, and they spend big on opening an open pit mine, for it to just lose money for almost a decade. Imperial Metals had been written up on VIC before, and Red Chris was one of the foundations of that writeup, but things didn’t work out as planned.</p> <p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 8pt; line-height: 107%; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Aptos, sans-serif;">Back in 2007, the company conducted a deep exploration drilling program, coming up with some great results. One standout was an interception of 1024.1 meters grading 1.01 per cent copper and 1.26 grams per tonne gold, one of the longest mineralized intercepts ever drilled in British Columbia. This drillhole opened up a whole new way of looking at this mineralization, or so you would think.</p> <p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 8pt; line-height: 107%; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Aptos, sans-serif;">Many drill programs later, the potential of an underground mine was established, and the company published an updated feasibility study in 2012, of an open pit mine.. To give an example, they published a report for a 29 mine life open pit mine with a 442 million capital cost and a base case NPV10 after tax of 134 million. So it wasn’t until the entry of Newcrest in August 2019, having bought a 70% stake in Red Chris from Imperial for 806 US million, that the potential of a block cave became obvious. Two years after their purchase they published a feasibility study for an underground block cave with an NPV of 2.3 Billion, a 31 year mine life and an AISC (All In Sustaining Cost) to mine of negative 180 US dollars per ounce, with 8.1 million ounces of gold and 2.2 Million tonnes of copper in reserves, from total ore produced of 406 Million tonnes (remember this last number).</p> <p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 8pt; line-height: 107%; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Aptos, sans-serif;">Newcrest were (prior to their merger with Newmont) the operator of the low cost Cadia mine in Australia. Cadia has long been somewhat the envy of the industry, given its long mine life and very low cost. This is achieved by a mining method called Block Caving. Block caving is a low cost method where they start mining the orebody underground from beneath. They essentially blast a long decline to a great depth, make reinforced corridors under the orebody and start drilling upwards in the orebody. Then they blast this body and remove ore from underneath so it comes caving down into some fixed drawpoints. As you can see, this mining method, due to the help of gravity is quite cheap. There is no need to back fill, keep drilling, use explosives or to developing new levels in the mine.</p> <p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 8pt; line-height: 107%; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Aptos, sans-serif;">Of course, there are some requirements for a block cave mine, like a very large and vertical orebody, some rock characteristics so it has the capability to cave in by its own weight, etc.. Luckily, Red Chris has these characteristics.</p> <p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 8pt; line-height: 107%; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Aptos, sans-serif;">At the current Imperial Metals EV of 740 million, that is pretty close to the 30% NPV of 2.3 Billion that Newcrest calculated for Red Chris. Some caveats here. The NPV was calculated with reference prices of 1500 dollar gold and 3.3 dollars per pound of copper. The current prices are at least 50% higher for both commodities. Additionally, the underground development (and capex) has advanced 3-4 years closer to production, and the time where Red Chris will become FCF positive is at the current prices probably this year, and at the feasibility study reference prices in 2 years, when the block caving will begin. In 2028, Red Chris should, at feasibility study prices, deliver a FCF to Imperial of 100 million, and in 2029 that number should be 200 million, or 50% of the current market cap. At the current higher commodity prices, that amount will probably be closer to 3-400 million in 2029, or about the current market cap. The NPV at 1750 gold and 4.15 copper is already 1.2 billion net to Imperial Metals (or almost 60% higher than the current EV, which will all go to the equity).</p> <p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 8pt; line-height: 107%; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Aptos, sans-serif;">And then there is ample opportunity for the orebody to expand. For example, at Cadia, many more orebodies have been discovered nearby, which is a common occurrence with this type of porphyr orebodies. And this isn’t just hope speaking, but the drillbit. There is an East Ridge orebody, for which there hasn’t been a feasibility study yet, but a 14 march 2023 press release estimates (although some more infill drilling is required) that there is probably a 400-500 million tonnes orebody there (remembered the first number?), at a grade about 10% lower than the current East-Zone mine plan, but still substantial.</p> <p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 8pt; line-height: 107%; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Aptos, sans-serif;">So this is an orebody about as large and maybe even larger as the current mine plan, and you get this for free. And we are only a few years in exploration around this mine. Already, a few other promising prospects have been identified, like the ‘Gully Zone’ and the ‘Main Zone’.</p> <p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 8pt; line-height: 107%; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Aptos, sans-serif;">The discovery of the East Ridge has Newcrest (and now Newmont) considering the possibility of mining East Ridge before Cave Block 2 (which is lower grade than East Ridge), or even advancing a second production front in parallel to the main underground development at Red Chris. It goes without saying that this would drastically enhance the NPV of this project.</p> <p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 8pt; line-height: 107%; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Aptos, sans-serif;">So why invest now and not just wait a few years?</p> <ul> <li><a href="https://valueinvesting.io/AMZN/valuation/wacc">Amazon CAPM</a></li> <li><a href="https://valueinvesting.io/AMZN/metric/forward-pe">Amazon Forward P/E</a></li> <li><a href="https://valueinvesting.io/AMZN/metric/gross-margin">Amazon Gross Margin</a></li> <li><a href="https://valueinvesting.io/AMZN/metric/net-margin">Amazon Net Margin</a></li> <li><a href="https://valueinvesting.io/AMZN/metric/roe">Amazon ROE Return on Equity</a></li> <li><a href="https://valueinvesting.io/AMZN/metric/roa">Amazon ROA Return on Asset</a></li> <li><a href="https://valueinvesting.io/AMZN/metric/graham-number">Amazon Graham Number</a></li> <li><a href="https://valueinvesting.io/AMZN/metric/current-ratio">Amazon Current Ratio</a></li> </ul> <p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 8pt; line-height: 107%; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Aptos, sans-serif;">From this year on, the open pit mine will reach its last 2 years of operations. One characteristic of open pit mines is that the last year or two is usually very profitable since that is a time when the strip ratio falls quite substantially and they can target the highest grade if the pit is well designed. This translates into the AISC of Red Chris to drop from above 2000 US dollars an ounce last year to going negative this year for the next two years. Add to this the higher commodity prices of copper and especially gold, and this comes just at the right time. The original mine plan at the lower commodity prices assumes for 2025 and 2026 to be free cash flow negative, but with these prices it should probably be FCF neutral or positive. From 2028 on, this mine will deliver +50% of the current market cap in F

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.437
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGöttingen Research OnlineSame topicDiatoms and Algae ResearchFrench-language works237,207