MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6927239684 · doi:10.26180/19069457

Coin Ptolemy I Soter, 305–283 B.C.

2022· other· en· W6927239684 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMonash University · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPtolemy's table of chordsCONQUESTNumismaticsEmpireKingdomMiddle Ages

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

References: Poole, R. S., Catalogue of Greek coins: the Ptolemies, kings of Egypt, London: BMP, 1883; Svoronos, I. N., Τα Νομισματα του Κρατους των Πτολεμαιων (The Coins of the Ptolemaic Kings), Sakellarios, Athens, 1904, 416, pl. 15, 424; Mørkholm, O., Early Hellenistic Coinage from the Accession of Alexander to the Peace of Apamaea (336-188 BC), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991; Hazzard, R. A., Ptolemaic Coins: An Introduction for Collectors, Toronto, 1995; Bouyon, B., Depeyrot, G., Desnier, J.-L., Le système et la technologie des monnaies de bronze, Wetteren, 2000; Lorber, C., Coins of the Ptolemaic Empire I: Ptolemy I through Ptolemy IV, New York: American Numismatic Society, 2018. Coin from the Ptolemaic Kingdom of Egypt, Ptolemy I Soter I (305-283 BC). On the obverse, head of deified-Alexander the Great in elephant skin headdress, to represent the last conquest of new territory before his death, India., and wearing aegis, facing right. Open-wing eagle standing left on thunderbolt with inscription ΠΤΟΛΕΜΑΙΟΥ (of Ptolemy) on the left field. Distinct monogram between the eagle's legs, the letter A (alpha). On both sides is partially visible the border of dots. Centering hole on both sides. Early coins often have punch holes suggesting they were repeatedly tested to determine their true composition or because of the technical manufacture as they were part of the flan preparation. Date: 305–283 B.C. Parallels: similar example London, British Museum 1980,1214.16094, TC,p236.3.PtoIX; for the elephant skin compare with London, British Museum 1876,0505.28, 1885,0505.15; Philadelphia, Penn Museum 29-70-302.Photo by Steve Morton

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.194
Threshold uncertainty score0.649

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1940.116

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonash UniversityFrench-language works237,207