MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6927382211 · doi:10.2802/236095

Digital platform work and occupational safety and health: overview of regulation, policies, practices and research

2022· article· en· W6927382211 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueLirias (KU Leuven) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicrobial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
Canadian institutionsDuPont (Canada)
FundersKU Leuven
KeywordsWork (physics)Digital healthOccupational safety and healthDigital transformationDigital economyEmerging technologies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Digital technologies are transforming the world of work in the European Union. Digital labour platforms are at the centre of this change. Despite the new job opportunities they provide, the scientific and policy communities have raised concerns about the working and employment conditions of digital platform work, including in the safety and health area. This report sheds light on occupational safety and health (OSH) in digital platform work. It presents the most recent evidence on the OSH challenges and opportunities in this type of work and examines if and how these are dealt with. The report provides an overview of regulation, policies and practices that address OSH in digital platform work. It also includes conclusions and recommendations for various stakeholders taking into account the different types of platform work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.724
Threshold uncertainty score0.284

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.199
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLirias (KU Leuven)Same topicMicrobial Natural Products and BiosynthesisFrench-language works237,207