Pleiotrophin Efficacy in vitro and Dose-Response Experiments in vivo Following an Incomplete Cervical Dorsolateral Quadrant Spinal Cord Injury in Adult Male and Female Lewis Rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY PURPOSE: To generate a dose-response curve for pleiotrophin (PTN) treatment in adult rat spinal cord injury (SCI) models and to further understand the capabilities of PTN in promoting neurite outgrowth in vitro and in vivo, compared to chondroitinase ABC (ChABC) therapy. DATA COLLECTED: To ensure our supply of PTN (provided by Dr. H. Rauvala, University of Helsinki, Finland) was viable and could promote neurite outgrowth, we tested PTN in vitro on cortical cells (collected from 0-day-old Sprague Dawley rats) grown on chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (CSPGs). Three biological and three technical replicates were conducted for each cell culture condition and 7-12 images were collected and analyzed per group (groups: LAM (laminin); LAM+lowCSPG+high_nPTN; LAM+highCSPG+high_oPTN; LAM+highCSPG+high_nPTN; LAM+highCSPG; LAM+lowCSPG+low_rhuPTN; LAM+lowCSPG+low_oPTN; LAM+lowCSPG+low_nPTN; LAM+lowCSPG). The data collected include the neurite length and soma counts. We have provided detailed methods in the methodology section. A dose-response experiment (n = 40, male and female Lewis rats) using a cervical level 4 (C4) dorsolateral quadrant (DLQ) SCI was conducted to determine the optimal dose of PTN to promote functional recovery and examine potential sex differences. PTN was injected directly into the intermediate grey matter at 2-2.5 mm caudal and ipsilateral to the SCI. The doses tested were 0.5 µg in 1 µL, 1.5 µg in 1 µL, 5 µg in 1 µL and 15 µg in 1 µL. A dose of approximately 1 µg in 1 µL was used in subsequent experiments. PTN efficacy at promoting functional recovery was also tested in comparison to a ChABC treatment using a C4 DLQ SCI. Three groups of female Lewis rats (total n = 9) were used: a no-treatment (PBS) control (1 µL; n = 3), a PTN treatment (1 µg in 1 µL; n = 3), and a ChABC treatment (1.33 U in 1 µL; n = 3). PTN and ChABC were found to produce similar levels of axonal growth compared to control treated animals. Von Frey hair test was used to assess bilateral forepaw tactile sensitivity before and at 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-weeks post-SCI in the dose-response experiment. Results indicated no hypersensitivity or allodynia due to PTN-treatment, regardless of the dose used. Horizontal ladder task was video recorded before and after SCI (PTN vs ChABC: 5 weeks post-SCI; Dose-response: 1-, 3-, and 5-weeks post-SCI) and analyzed in a blinded manner. The horizontal ladder task did not reveal any significant changes to long-term motor function in relation to increasing doses of PTN or in comparison to ChABC and control rats. Cylinder test recordings were taken before and at 5 weeks post-SCI for the PTN vs ChABC experiment only to test spontaneous forelimb use. We found no significant differences between groups. Histological analysis of lesion severity was performed on transverse sections of the spinal cord showing the largest area of SCI damage. Sections were immune-stained with 0.5% cresyl violet solution and visualized using brightfield and phase-contrast microscopy. No difference in injury severity was detected between groups for the PTN vs. ChABC experiment. DATA USAGE NOTES:
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".