DULL: A Fast Scalable Detectable Unrolled Lock-Based Linked List
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Persistent memory (PM) has emerged as a promising technology that enables data structures to preserve their consistent state after recovering from system failures. Detectable data structures have been proposed to detect the response of the last operation of a crashed process. Various lock-free detectable and recoverable concurrent data structures have been developed in the literature. However, designing detectable lock-based structures is challenging due to the need to preserve the correctness properties of the underlying locks, such as mutual exclusion and deadlock-freedom, across failures. Therefore, lock-based detectable and persistent data structures are not as common as lock-free structures. In this work, we introduce DULL: a fast, scalable and Detectable Unrolled Lock-based Linked list. This paper presents the design and implementation of DULL, along with an evaluation of its recoverability and scalability. Experimental Results show that DULL is several-fold faster than the competition in all workloads that involve updates. Moreover, as opposed to some of the previous works, our algorithm is scalable when the multiprocessor is oversubscribed. DULL is a demonstration of the feasibility of using lock-based data structures with detectability in PM environments. We believe that DULL opens up new research directions for designing and analyzing detectable lock-based data structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".