MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6929034869 · doi:10.48448/2my7-0h88

15:05 - 15:20: Biomechanical behaviour of lizard osteoderms and skin under external loading

2022· other· en· W6929034869 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUnderline Science Inc. · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLizardExtant taxonVertebrateSquamataExoskeleton

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biomechanical behaviour of lizard osteoderms and skin under external loading Loïc Kéver1, Olivier Damien2, Arsalan Marghoub3, Mehran Moazen3, Susan Evans3, Matthew K. Vickaryous 4, Arkhat Abzhanov5, Anthony Herrel 1,6 1National Museum of Natural History, France 2CONACyT Autonomous University of Baja California Sur, Mexico 3University College London, UK 4University of Guelph, Canada 5Imperial College London, UK 6Ghent University, Belgium Dermal bony plates also known as osteoderms are present in several distantly related vertebrate taxa and they are particularly common and diverse among extant lizards. Lizard osteoderms have classically been considered to be protective elements against predator attacks. However, empirical data supporting this hypothesis are scant and one of the basic questions pertaining to their diversity has never been addressed: are there interspecific differences in the deformation of lizard osteoderms under external loading? We sampled formalin fixed specimens from eleven species of lizards with osteoderms of different morphologies, instrumented one of the temporal osteoderms with a rectangular rosette strain gauge and loaded different areas of their head to better understand the mechanical responses of osteoderms to loading. Our goals were to 1) test whether loadings applied in different locations of the head (including on the instrumented osteoderm) generated strains in the instrumented osteoderm, 2) explore whether species differed in the relative stiffness of their osteoderm and skin and 3) provide insights into the morphological features and patterns of organization associated with variation in stiffness. We show that loading neighboring osteoderms can generate large strains in the instrumented osteoderm. Moreover, despite a large overlap between some species, the strains recorded showed interspecific differences in magnitude. Smaller strains were recorded in species with relatively thick osteoderms including Heloderma suspectum, H. horridum and Tiliqua rugosa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUnderline Science Inc.French-language works237,207