MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6929044984 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0806.3106

A 1200-micron MAMBO survey of the GOODS-N field: a significant population of submillimetre drop-out galaxies

2008· preprint· en· W6929044984 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2008
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest Insect Ecology and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBolometerGalaxyFlux (metallurgy)RedshiftSource countsPopulationPlanckMillimeter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a 1200-micron image of the Great Observatories Origin Deep Survey North (GOODS-N) field, obtained with the Max Planck Millimeter Bolometer array (MAMBO) on the IRAM 30-m telescope. The survey covers a contiguous area of 287 square arcmin to a near-uniform noise level of ~0.7mJy/beam. After Bayesian flux deboosting, a total of 30 sources are recovered (>=3.5sigma). An optimal combination of our 1200-micron data and an existing 850-micron image from the Submillimetre Common-User Bolometer Array (SCUBA) yielded 33 sources (>=4sigma). We combine our GOODS-N sample with those obtained in the Lockman Hole and ELAIS-N2 fields (Scott et al. 2002; Greve et al. 2004) in order to explore the degree of overlap between 1200-micron- and 850-micron-selected galaxies (hereafter SMGs), finding no significant difference between their 850-micron to 1200-micron flux density distributions. However, a noise-weighted stacking analysis yields a significant detection of the 1200-micron-blank SCUBA sources, whereas no significant 850-micron signal is found for the 850-micron-blank MAMBO sources. The hypothesis that the 850/1200-micron flux density distribution of SCUBA sources is also representative of the MAMBO population is rejected at the ~4sigma level, via Monte Carlo simulations. Therefore, although the populations overlap, galaxies selected at 850 and 1200micron are different, and there is compelling evidence for a significant 1200-micron-detected population which is not recovered at 850micron. These are submm drop-outs (SDOs), with S_850/S_1200 = 0.7-1.7, requiring very cold dust or unusual spectral energy distributions (T_d ~ 10K; beta ~ 1), unless SDOs reside beyond the redshift range observed for radio-identified SMGs, i.e. at z > 4.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.133 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)→Same topicForest Insect Ecology and Management→French-language works237,207→