MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6929123789 · doi:10.4224/12340950

Ice regimes encountered during the transit of the USCGC Healy: 2 April to 25 April 2000

2000· report· en· W6929123789 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2000
Typereport
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal and Maternal Infections
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaCanadian Wood Council
FundersTransport Canada
KeywordsArctic ice packSea iceCoast guardTransit (satellite)The arcticAntarctic sea ice

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report presents a synopsis of the ice conditions encountered by the United States Coast Guard Cutter Healy during Phase III of the Ice Trials. Phase III was conducted from 31 March to 25 April 2000 in the in the Eastern Canadian Arctic. During that voyage, 118 Ice Regimes were traversed. This report includes a detailed description of 20 of those Ice Regimes. Particulars about the ice conditions, vessel routing, ship operations and climatic conditions are given. An Ice Numeral is calculated for each Ice Regime using the methodology outlined in the Arctic Ice Regime Shipping System (AIRSS) Regulations. A brief evaluation of AIRSS is given, whereby the calculated Ice Numeral is correlated with the relative ease or difficulty experienced by the Healy in each Regime.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.395
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicNeonatal and Maternal InfectionsFrench-language works237,207