MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6929134923 · doi:10.4224/40001929

Level 1: Preliminary Seismic Risk Screening Tool (PST) for existing buildings. Part 1: user's guide

2020· report· en· W6929134923 on OpenAlexafffundvenue

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2020
Typereport
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Structure and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
FundersUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsOccupancySeismic riskKey (lock)Earthquake scenarioBenchmark (surveying)Certainty

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Level 1 – PST aims to quickly identify buildings for which the seismic performance can be assessed with reasonable certainty on the basis of four key criteria, namely: (1) seismicity; (2) benchmark NBC edition; (3) remaining occupancy time; and (4) consequences of failure. The Level 1 – PST also identifies special conditions that immediately trigger further seismic risk assessment. These conditions are (1) unknown model building type, (2) federal heritage designation, (3), change of occupancy results in increase of structural loads, (4) consequences of failure higher than original consequences of failure, (5) Site Class F (such as liquefiable soils), and (6) presence of geologic hazards.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.331
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicProtein Structure and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207