Spark: Sparsified Hierarchical Energy Minimization of RNA Pseudoknots
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Motivation. Determining RNA structure is essential for understanding RNA function and interaction networks. Although experimental techniques yield high‑accuracy structures, they are costly and time‑consuming; thus, computational approaches - especially minimum‑free‑energy (MFE) prediction algorithms - are indispensable. Accurately predicting pseudoknots, however, remains challenging because their inclusion usually leads to prohibitive computational complexity. Recent work demonstrated that sparsification can improve the efficiency of complex pseudoknot prediction algorithms such as Knotty. This finding suggests similar gains are possible for already efficient algorithms like HFold, which targets a complementary class of hierarchically constrained pseudoknots. Results. We introduce Spark, an exact, fully sparsified algorithm for predicting pseudoknotted RNA structures. Like its non‑sparsified predecessor HFold, Spark searches for the minimum‑energy structure under the HotKots 2.0 energy model, a pseudoknot extension of the Turner model. Because the sparsification is non‑heuristic, Spark preserves the asymptotic time‑ and space‑complexity guarantees of HFold while greatly reducing the constant factors. We benchmarked the performance of Spark against HFold and, as a pseudoknot‑free baseline, RNAfold. Compared with HFold, Spark substantially lowers both run time and memory usage, while achieving run‑time figures close to those of RNAfold. Across all tested sequence lengths, Spark used the least memory and consistently ran faster than HFold. Conclusion. By extending non‑heuristic sparsification to hierarchical pseudoknot prediction, Spark delivers an exceptionally fast and memory‑efficient tool accurate prediction of pseudoknotted RNA structures, enabling routine analysis of long sequences. The algorithm broadens the practical scope of computational RNA biology and provides a solid foundation for future advances in structure‑based functional annotation. Availability. Spark’s implementation and detailed results are available at https://github.com/TheCOBRALab/Spark.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".