MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6929159758 · doi:10.48548/pubdata-297

Die Gesundheitsfördende Schule

2006· dissertation· en· W6929159758 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMultilingual Matters (Channel View Publications) · 2006
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSchool Health and Nursing Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermanCharterHealth promotionHealth educationPublic healthPromotion (chess)Comparative educationHealth policy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study describes international influence on the development and implementation of the concept of the health promoting school in Germany. In a field study the Ministries of Education of the 16 Länder of Germany were asked about the development of health education in schools and the implementation of the concept of the health promoting school in the period from 1989 - 1999. In total the development of health education in schools and the implementation of the concept of the health promoting school was determend by international organizations WHO, EU and Council of Europe. The education system of Germany took over the WHO-definition of health, the contents of the WHO-Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion and the WHO, EU and Concil of Europe concept of the health promoting school. It can be cocluded that the german education system is willing and capable on international cooperation - in spite of Länder-sovereignty for their educational sytem and EU responsibility for subsidiarty.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.104

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0000.007
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.451
Teacher spread0.383 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMultilingual Matters (Channel View Publications)Same topicSchool Health and Nursing EducationFrench-language works237,207