MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6929241348 · doi:10.48336/p5sc-c819

Machine learning methods for fault detection and diagnosis of digitalized processing system

2022· article· en· W6929241348 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Health and Biochemistry
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFault detection and isolationContext (archaeology)Fault (geology)AutomationArtificial neural networkProcess (computing)Anomaly detectionPredictive maintenance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis presents novel development and applications of machine learning techniques for process fault detection, diagnosis, and prognosis from safety and predictive maintenance perspectives. The main contributions of this thesis include the development of (i) new algorithms to diagnose the unlabelled faults; (ii) a self-learning tool for fault detection and diagnosis of untrained faults; (iii) a forecast model for fault conditions; (iv) a framework for root cause analysis in an automated environment; and (v) a methodology for estimating the remaining useful life. In the context of Industry 4.0, process plants’ operations have become increasingly autonomous and run in an intelligent mode. An intelligent process operation takes advantage of online data, uses advanced modelling approaches and utilizes automation to achieve a flexible, smart, and reconfigurable operation. In such an autonomous environment, process fault detection, diagnosis, and prognosis play critical roles in ensuring its safety and integrity. In this study intelligent fault detection and diagnosis methods are developed based on state-of-the-art machine learning techniques. Further, this study is extended to calculate the remaining useful life online, using the fault to failure transmission time. The research study results in five signification contributions. First, a comprehensive review of the existing fault detection and diagnosis approaches was conducted to identify the knowledge gaps and to develop fault detection and diagnosis approaches that are best suited for Industry 4.0. Second, a cognitive fault detection and diagnosis technique using unlabelled process data and an anomaly detection technique using machine learning were developed. Third, a self-learning neural network and permutation algorithm were developed for prediction of the root cause of a detected fault. Fourth, a methodology was developed to early predict faults, based on monitoring the fault symptoms using a deep learning algorithm. Fifth, a model was developed to estimate the remaining useful life using the system’s failure threshold and a degradation model. In this research work, all the proposed models were developed using self-learning methodologies. Therefore, the work constitutes an essential step towards developing an autonomous fault detection, diagnosis, and remaining useful life estimation tool. The proposed frameworks are validated using experimental data and simulated process system data. The findings from this study highlight that by integrating unsupervised and supervised learning, without prior knowledge of the fault condition, the proposed machine learning model was able to detect and diagnose the fault conditions. Unsupervised learning was used to detect the unknown fault conditions, and a neural network permutation algorithm was used to identify the root cause for the detected unknown faults. This work also used supervised learning to classify the known fault conditions. Furthermore, by investigating the failure condition of the identified root cause variable or feature, remaining useful life was estimated by developing a regression model. Likewise, this thesis finds the solution for early fault detection in real-time by integrating the deep learning tools with unsupervised learning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)Same topicNeonatal Health and BiochemistryFrench-language works237,207