MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6929364278 · doi:10.48336/wfh1-ya73

Greenhouse gas fluxes in a boreal peatland under experimental warming, nitrogen addition, and vegetation composition change

2022· article· en· W6929364278 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeatGreenhouse gasCarbon sinkBorealGlobal warmingClimate changeSink (geography)SphagnumPrimary production

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although peatlands cover only 3% of land surface over the world, they have stored a large amount of carbon due to the relatively higher rate of net primary production than decomposition. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) shows that net zero carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions should be reached around 2050 to limit warming to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels. The carbon sink function of peatlands could help to reduce global warming (cooling function). However, it is unclear whether this carbon sink function of peatlands will be altered under future global changes such as climate warming, elevated nitrogen (N) deposition, and vegetation composition change. Moreover, methane (CH₄) and nitrous oxide (N₂O) are two potent greenhouse gases with 25 and 298 times higher global warming potential than CO₂, respectively. Their responses to the three global changes (climate warming, elevated nitrogen deposition, and vegetation composition change) are poorly known in peatland ecosystems, especially the interaction of the three global changes, which leads to an uncertainty in evaluating the cooling function of peatlands in the future. In this thesis, the three global changes were mimicked in a boreal peatland located in western Newfoundland, Canada. The fluxes of greenhouse gases (CO₂, CH₄, and N₂O) and environmental variables were measured. The results showed that a change in vegetation composition played an essential role in net CO₂ uptake. With graminoid removal, net CO₂ uptake was significantly decreased, and combined warming and N addition (WN) further decreased CO₂ uptake owing to the detrimental effect of N on Sphagnum mosses. Shrub removal also decreased net CO₂ uptake, but CO₂ uptake could recover in the seventh year owing to the growth of graminoids. Warming and N addition could promote graminoid growth, which might offset the loss of Sphagnum moss cover. Consequently, the net CO₂ uptake was not altered under the condition of shrub removal. Graminoid removal significantly decreased CH₄ emissions due to the reduction of available carbon for CH₄ production and aerenchyma (air channels of some plants) for CH₄ transport from soil to the atmosphere. However, this negative effect was not observed under WN conditions, possibly owing to the alteration of temperature sensitivity. Shrub removal significantly decreased CH₄ emissions under warming treatment, but this negative effect was also not observed under WN conditions, which could be attributed to the growth of graminoids. The positive impact of graminoid growth on CH₄ emission could offset the negative effect of shrub removal. Nitrogen addition significantly promoted N₂O emissions due to the increase of nitrogen availability for N₂O production. Warming could mitigate the positive effect of N addition under intact vegetation in the middle growing season, which could be attributed to the stimulation of N uptake by plants and less N for N₂O production. With the removal of graminoids or shrubs, WN significantly increased N₂O emissions in the early growing season owing to the alleviation of carbon and nitrogen limitation for N₂O production. In summary, if the dominant vegetation shifts to shrubs, the net CO₂ uptake in peatlands would be decreased under climate warming and elevated N deposition. If the dominant vegetation shifts to graminoids, the net CO₂ uptake in peatlands would also be decreased in a short time (~ 3 years) under climate warming and elevated N deposition, but could recover in a long time (~7 years). No matter whether the dominant vegetation shifts to shrubs or graminoids, their impacts on CH₄ emissions would be negligible under climate warming and elevated N deposition. In contrast, no matter whether the dominant vegetation shifts to shrubs or graminoids in the future, the N₂O emissions were significantly promoted under climate warming and elevated N deposition. Overall, taking all three greenhouse gases into account, the cooling function of peatlands would be reduced under future climate warming, elevated N deposition, and vegetation composition change. Besides peatland conservation, other effective measures should be taken in order to slow down the global temperature increase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.146

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)Same topicPeatlands and Wetlands EcologyFrench-language works237,207