MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6929573269 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10538654

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) yukonae Gibbs 2010, new species

2010· other· en· W6929573269 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2010
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Structure and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHead (geology)Apex (geometry)Compound eyeAdult male

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) yukonae Gibbs, new species (Figures 240A–E, 241A–D) Holotype. ♀ CANADA, British Columbia, Pitt Meadows, N49°13´25´´ W122°45´12´´, comm. cranberry field “Banns” WPT 25.vi.2005 (C. Ratti); [PCYU] Diagnosis. Females of L. yukonae can be recognised by the diagnostic combination of moderately wide to round head (length/width ratio = 0.96–1.00), tessellate mesoscutum with dense punctures dense including the medial portion, mesepisternum dull without evident irregular punctures, metapostnotum with strongly anastomosing rugae (Fig. 240E), T1 acarinarial fan complete dorsally, metasomal terga polished with faint metallic reflections and T3–T4 with moderately dense tomentum. They are most similar to L. sheffieldi and L. perpunctatum. Female L. sheffieldi have a longer head (length/width ratio = 1.00–1.01), sparse mesoscutal punctures medially and shiny mesepisternum with evident punctures. Female L. perpunctatum have a wide head (length/width ratio = 0.95–0.96) and primarily longitudinal rugae on the metapostnotum. Males of L. yukonae can be recognised by the diagnostic combination of head moderately long (length/ width ratio = 1.02), face below eye emarginaton obscured by dense white tomentum, flagellomeres moderately short (length/width ratio = 1.55–1.61), mesepisternum reticulate-punctate, tegula moderately elongate with weak posterior angle, and metabasitarsus pale brown. They are most similar to L. albipenne, L. perpunctatum and L. sheffieldi. Male L. albipenne have metabasitarsus yellow. Male L. perpunctatum have facial tomentum limited to lower paraocular area. Male L. sheffieldi have a longer head (length/width ratio = 1.06– 1.08) with less extensive facial tomentum. Description. FEMALE. Length 5.86–6.80 mm; head length 1.61–1.66 mm; head width 1.61–1.70 mm; forewing length 4.15–4.58 mm. Colouration. Head and mesosoma pale green with bluish and golden reflections. Clypeus with apical half blackish brown and basal half, and supraclypeal area bronze. Antenna dark brown, flagellum with ventral surface reddish brown. Tegula translucent reddish amber. Wing membrane subhyaline, venation and pterostigma pale amber. Legs brown, medio- and distitarsi reddish. Metasomal blackish brown, terga and sterna with apical margins amber to pale translucent yellow. Pubescence. Dull white. Moderately dense. Head and mesosoma with moderately dense woolly hairs (1– 1.5 OD), longest on genal beard, metanotum and mesopleuron (2–2.5 OD). Lower paraocular area and gena with sparse, subappressed tomentum, not obscuring surface. Propodeum with dense plumose hairs on lateral and posterior surfaces (2–2.5 OD). Metasomal terga with moderately dense, fine setae. T1 acarinarial fan dense, complete dorsally. T1 dorsolateral portion with small patch of appressed tomentum. T2 basolaterally and T3–T5 entirely with tomentum partially obscuring surface. T2 apicolateral and T3–T4 apical margins with weak fringes. Surface sculpture. Face imbricate, punctation moderately fine. Clypeus with apical half polished, basal punctation dense (i≤d). Supraclypeal area with punctation sparse (i=1–3d). Lower paraocular and antennocular areas with punctation dense (i≤d). Upper paraocular area and frons punctate-reticulate. Ocellocular area minutely punctate (i≤d). Gena lineolate. Postgena polished, weakly lineolate. Mesoscutum imbricate-tessellate, punctation fine, dense between parapsidal lines (i≤d), except on anteromedial and submedial areas (i=1– 1.5d), and dense laterad of parapsidal line (i≤d), contiguous on anterolateral portion of disc. Mesoscutellum polished, submedial punctation moderately dense (i=1–2d). Axilla punctate. Metanotum imbricate. Preëpisternum rugulose. Hypoepimeral area imbricate, obscurely punctate. Mesepisternum ruguloso-imbricate, obscurely punctate. Metepisternum with dorsal half rugoso-striate, ventral half imbricate. Metapostnotum with strong anastomosing rugae. Propodeum with dorsolateral slope rugose, lateral surface ruguloso-imbricate, posterior surface rugulose. Metasomal terga polished except T1 declivitous surface weakly coriarious, punctation fine, on basal halves dense (i=1–1.5d), on apical half moderately sparse (i=2–3d). Structure. Head moderately wide to round (length/width ratio = 0.96–1.00). Eyes weakly convergent below (UOD/LOD = 1.07–1.16). Clypeus 2/3 below suborbital tangent, apicolateral margins strongly convergent. Antennal sockets close (IAD/OAD <0.5). Frontal line carinate, ending 2 OD below median ocellus. Gena narrower than eye. Hypostomal carina parallel. Tegula ovoid, somewhat elongate with slight posterior angle (Fig. 241D). Inner metatibial spur pectinate with 3–4 teeth. Metapostnotum crescentic. Metapostnotum moderately elongate (MMR ratio = 1.23–1.27), posterior margin weakly angled onto posterior surface. Propodeum with oblique carina weak, lateral carina not reaching dorsal margin. MALE. Similar to female except for the usual secondary sexual characters and as follows. Length 4.96 mm; head length 1.51 mm; head width 1.49 mm; forewing length 3.87 mm. Colouration. Head and mesosoma blue. Flagellum with ventral surface reddish brown. Wings hyaline. Tibial bases and medio- and distitarsi reddish brown. Metasoma dark brown; apical margins pale translucent yellow Pubescence. Face below eye emargination with moderately dense tomentum obscuring surface, densest on lower paraocular area, sparse on distal half of clypeus. Gena with sparse tomentum. T2–T4 basolaterally with very sparse tomentum. S2–S5 apicolaterally with very sparse plumose hairs (1 OD). Surface sculpture. Mesocutum polished, punctation between parapsidal lines sparse (i=1–2.5). Mesepisternum polished, reticulate-punctate. Metapostnotum posterior margin smooth, polished. Propodeum with dorsolateral slope rugulose. Structure. Head moderately elongate (length/width ratio = 1.02). Eyes convergent below (UOD/LOD ratio = 1.22). Antennal sockets distant (IAD/OAD> 1.0). Pedicel length subequal to F1. F2 length 1.7X F1. F2– F10 moderately short (length/width ratio = 1.55–1.61). Metapostnotum moderately elongate (MMR ratio = 1.27), posterior margin rounded onto posterior surface. Terminalia. S7 with median lobe elongate, columnar, apex rounded (as in Fig. 210F). S8 with apicomedial margin weakly convex (as in Fig. 210F). Genitalia similar to Fig. 210D–E. Gonobase with ventral arms narrowly separated. Gonostylus small, dorsal setae elongate. Retrorse lobe elongate, weakly attenuated apically. Range. Southwestern British Columbia north to the Yukon Territory (Fig. 239). Allotype. CANADA: YUKON TERRITORY: ♂ 14 mi E. Dawson, 1300ʹ, 3.viii.1962 (R. E. Leech); [CNC]. Paratypes. CANADA: BRITISH COLUMBIA: 1♀ 9.v.2001; [PCYU]; 2♀ Saanich, Island View Beach, N48°33´59´´ W123°22´02´´, 19.vi.1994 (Nadel & Hannah); [RBCM]; YUKON TERRITORY: 1♀ Kluane N.P., 10.vii.2006 (L. Packer); Carcross Dunes, vii.2006 (L. Packer); [PCYU]. Etymology. The specific epithet has a dual meaning. It refers to the location of the first recognised specimens from the Yukon Territory and is also dedicated to Yuko Nozoe for putting up with my infatuation with bees. Floral records. ROSACEAE: Prunus serrulata. Comments. Rare. This species is only known from a small number of individuals from sandy areas (beaches or dunes). The same is true for its possible sister species L. sheffieldi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.142
Threshold uncertainty score0.282

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicProtein Structure and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207