Group 8-10 complexes of pyridyl-phosphinimines and chiral bis-diiminophosphoranes.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A group of exocyclic pyridyl-phosphinimine ligands have been prepared in excellent yields by oxidizing trip henylphosphine with 2-azidomethylpyridines. These ligands reacted with group 8--10 transition metals to form various late transition metal complexes (e.g. [Ph3P=NCH2(2-Py)]NiBr 2 36) which have been characterized and evaluated for olefin polymerization activity. We found that these complexes are not active for ethylene polymerization or oligomerization. In a similar sense, nickel complexes 55 and 56 were synthesized by the reaction of nickel dihalide with a chiral bis-diiminophosphorane ligands. The corresponding ligand was prepared by deprotonation of R-2,2' -diamino-1,1'-binaphthalenetriphenyldibromide by a strong base. The complexes were seemed to be inactive for ethylene polymerization, and were therefore not tested for alpha-olefins polymerization.Dept. of Chemistry and Biochemistry. Paper copy at Leddy Library: Theses & Major Papers - Basement, West Bldg. / Call Number: Thesis2003 .A47. Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 42-02, page: 0594. Adviser: D. W. Stephan. Thesis (M.Sc.)--University of Windsor (Canada), 2003.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".