MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6929683171 · doi:10.5061/dryad.83bk3jb1h

Canada’s extreme wildfires dominate the decline in global land carbon sinks in 2023

2024· dataset· en· W6929683171 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2024
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPasture and Agricultural Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCarbon sinkSink (geography)Carbon cyclePrecipitationGlobal warmingEcosystemGlobal changeClimate change

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Terrestrial land carbon sinks are strongly influenced by climate extremes, and 2023 is the warmest year on record, accompanied by an El Niño event, extreme wildfires, and extreme precipitation and drought, but their impact on global land sinks in 2023 remains unclear. Here, we used the Global Carbon Assimilation System, version 2, to estimate recent global land sinks by assimilating the OCO-2 ACOS v11.1 XCO2 retrievals. We estimate the global land sink to be -1.63 ± 0.52 PgC/yr in 2023. Compared to 2017-2022, it decreases by 0.59 PgC/yr, in which net ecosystem exchange decreases by only 0.14 PgC/yr, but wildfire emissions increase significantly by 0.45 PgC/yr, mainly in Canada. Our findings suggest that extreme wildfires are an important threat to land sinks under global warming.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score0.458

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicPasture and Agricultural SystemsFrench-language works237,207