MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6929718769 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10067155

Martini 3 force field parameters for protein lipidation post-translational modifications

2023· article· en· W6929718769 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhytochemical Studies and Bioactivities
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLipid-anchored proteinATG8Force field (fiction)PalmitoylationProtein–protein interactionLipid bilayerPrenylationMyristoylationProtein aggregation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data for the publication "Martini 3 force field parameters for protein lipidation post-translational modifications" in the Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation Protein lipidations are vital co-translational or post-translational modifications that tether lipid tails to specific protein aminoacids to allow them to anchor to biological membranes, switch their subcellular localizations, and modulate association with other proteins. Such lipidations are thus crucial for multiple biological processes such as signal transduction, protein trafficking and membrane localization, and are implicated in various diseases as well. Examples of such lipid-anchored proteins include the Ras family of proteins that undergo farnesylation, actin and gelsolin, which are myristoylated, phospholipase D, which is palmitoylated, glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins and others. Here, we develop parameters for the latest version of the Martini 3 coarse-grained force field for cysteine-targeting farnesylation, geranylgeranylation and palmitoylation as well as the glycine-targeting myristoylation due to the importance of these lipidations in disease and in particular for studying cancer and anti-cancer drug discovery. The parameters are developed using the CHARMM36m all-atom force field parameters as reference. The behavior of the coarse-grained models is consistent with that of the all-atom force field for all lipidations and reproduces key dynamical and structural features such as solvent-accessible surface area, bilayer penetration depth, and cluster representative conformations. The parameters, along with mapping schemes for the popular martinize2 tool, are immediately available for download.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.723
Threshold uncertainty score0.697

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicPhytochemical Studies and BioactivitiesFrench-language works237,207