MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6929746121 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.1010394

Exploration17 Workshop: Uncertainty In 3D Modeling And Inversion

2017· other· en· W6929746121 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicVitamin K Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInversion (geology)3D modelingSchedule3d modelNumerical modelingData quality

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Datasets and instructions necessary for the Uncertainty in 3D Modeling and Inversion workshop held at the Exploration17 decennial conference, Toronto. The present content is freely accessible to participants and non participants alike for educational and non profit use. Contents: All talks from the workshop (ppt, pdf) General documentation/talks that describe GeoModeller Agenda, program schedule and survey of quality of the workshop

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.253

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0030.009
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0760.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicVitamin K Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207