MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6929830655 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10538636

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) ebmerellum Gibbs 2010, new species

2010· other· en· W6929830655 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2010
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSternumApex (geometry)HyalineHead (geology)Sterna

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<i>Lasioglossum</i> (<i>Dialictus</i>) <i>ebmerellum</i> Gibbs, new species <p>(Figures 101A–D, 102A–F)</p> <p> <b>Holotype.</b> ♀ CANADA, Alberta, 15 km N Elkwater, Hwy 41, N49.93857 W110.34962, 625 m, (Gibbs & Sheffield), on yellow composite [PCYU: PYU-1603]</p> <p> <b>Diagnosis.</b> Females of <i>L. ebmerellum</i> can be recognised by the diagnostic combination of an elongate face (length/width ratio = 1.04–1.06) with a strongly protruding clypeus, moderately dense mesoscutal punctures (i=1–1.5d), subhyaline wings, distinct punctures on the mesoscutum, metapostnotum with rugae reaching approximately 2/3 of the distance to apical margin (Fig. 101D); brown metasomal terga with dense tomentum on T3–T4 and T1 acarinarial fan very dense. They are most similar to <i>L. hyalinum</i> which have a round head (length/width ratio = 0.94–0.95) and hyaline wings.</p> <p> Males of <i>L. ebmerellum</i> can be recognised by the diagnostic combination of a weakly convergent eyes (UOD/LOD ratio = 1.16), elongate mandibles, gena width subequal to eye, distinct mesepisternal punctures, coarsely punctate dorsolateral slope of the propodeum and strong punctures throughout on the metasomal terga.</p> <p> <b>Description.</b> FEMALE. Length 5.49–6.40 mm; head length 1.80–1.94 mm; head width 1.73–1.85 mm; forewing length 4.58–4.64 mm.</p> <p> <i>Colouration.</i> Head and mesosoma blue with greenish reflections to green with golden reflections. Clypeus with apical half blackish brown, basal half, and supraclypeal area bronze. Antenna dark brown, F2–F10 with ventral surface orange-yellow. Tegula dark amber. Wing membrane hyaline, venation and pterostigma pale honey-coloured. Legs brown, tibial bases, medio- and distitarsi reddish brown. Metasoma dark brown, terga and sterna with apical margins reddish to pale yellow.</p> <p> <i>Pubescence.</i> Dull white. Moderately abundant. Head and mesosoma with dense woolly hairs (1–1.5 OD), longest on genal beard, metanotum and mesopleuron (2–2.5 OD). Lower paraocular area with very sparse subappressed tomentum. Gena with tomentum. Propodeum with dense plumose hairs on lateral and posterior surfaces (2–2.5 OD). Metasomal terga with moderately dense, fine setae. T1 acarinarial fan dense, complete dorsally. T1 dorsolateral portion, T2 basolaterally and T3–T5 entirely with dense tomentum. T2 apicolateral and T3–T4 apical margins with sparse fringes.</p> <p> <i>Surface sculpture.</i> Face imbricate, punctation moderately strong. Clypeal punctation moderately sparse (i=1.5–2d), apical half nearly impunctate. Supraclypeal area with punctation moderately sparse (i=1–2d). Lower paraocular and antennocular areas with punctation dense (i≤d). Upper paraocular area and frons punctate-reticulate. Ocellocular area minutely punctate (i≤d). Gena and inner half of postgena strigate, outer half polished. Mesoscutum polished, weakly imbricate anteromedially, punctation fine, moderately dense between parapsidal lines (i=1–1.5d), dense laterad of parapsidal lines and on anterolateral portion of disc (i<d). Mesoscutellum similar to mesoscutum, submedial punctation sparse (i=1–3d). Axilla densely punctate. Metanotum imbricate-punctate. Preëpisternum reticulate. Hypoepimeral area reticulate-punctate. Mesepisternum polished, coarsely punctate above, very finely punctate below. Metepisternum dorsal third rugulose-striate, ventral portion imbricate. Metapostnotum rugoso-striate, reaching approximately two-thirds of the distance to posterior margin, posterior margin smooth, weakly imbricate. Propodeum with dorsolateral slope rugulose on anterior half, imbricate on posterior half, lateral surface minutely reticulate to tessellate, posterior surface strongly imbricate. Metasomal terga weakly coriarious, punctation on basal halves dense (i=1–1.5d), sparse on apical halves (i=2–2.5d).</p> <p> <i>Structure.</i> Head elongate (length/width ratio = 1.04–1.06). Eyes weakly convergent below (UOD/LOD ratio = 1.05–1.07). Clypeus 9/10 below suborbital tangent, apicolateral margins convergent. Antennal sockets close (IAD/OAD <0.5). Medial ocellus below upper ocular tangent. Gena narrower than eye. Inner metatibial spur pectinate with 4 teeth. Metapostnotum moderately elongate (MMR ratio = 1.19–1.23), posterior margin weakly angled onto posterior surface. Propodeum with oblique carina very weak or absent, lateral carina not reaching dorsal margin.</p> <p>MALE. Similar to female except for the usual secondary sexual characters and as follows. Length 6.15 mm; head length 1.84 mm; head width 1.81 mm; forewing length 4.51 mm.</p> <p> <i>Colouration.</i> Head and mesosoma blue. F1–F11 with ventral surface yellow. Tegula reddish brown. Metasoma blackish brown, terga and sterna with apical margins reddish.</p> <p> <i>Pubescence.</i> Clypeus, and supraclypeal area with sparse tomentum. Lower paraocular area with very dense pubescence, completely obscuring surface below. Paraocular area and frons below level of eye emargination with dense tomentum largely obscuring surface. Gena with sparse tomentum. Metasomal terga lateral portions with moderately dense pubescence. Metasomal sterna with sparse pubescence.</p> <p> <i>Surface sculpture.</i> Gena closely punctate-lineolate (i<d). Mesepisternum polished, coarsely punctate (i=d). Propodeum with dorsolateral slope and posterior surface punctate (i≤d), lateral surface reticulate-punctate. Metasomal terga deeply punctate (i=1–2d), T4–T6 apical impressed areas impunctate.</p> <p> <i>Structure.</i> Head moderately elongate (length/width ratio = 1.01). Eyes weakly convergent below (UOD / LOD ratio = 1.16). Mandible moderately elongate, nearly reaching opposing mandible base. Clypeus 4/5 below suborbital line, anterolateral margins convergent. Antennal sockets distant (IAD/OAD = 1.5). Frontal line carinate, ending 2 OD below median ocellus. Pedicel shorter than F1. F2 length 1.5X F1. F2–F10 (length/ width ratio = 1.43–1.57). Metapostnotum moderately elongate (MMR ratio = 1.31), posterior margin rounded onto posterior surface.</p> <p> <i>Terminalia</i>. S7 with median lobe strongly clavate, apex rounded (Fig. 102F). S8 with apicomedial margin weakly convex (Fig. 102F). Genitalia as in Fig. 102D–E. Gonobase with ventral arms narrowly separated. Gonostylus small, dorsal setae elongate. Retrorse lobes narrow, attenuated and reflexed apically.</p> <p> <b>Range.</b> Alberta, south to Nevada, Utah (Fig. 103).</p> <p> <b>Allotype.</b> NEVADA: 1♂ Clark Co., 0.53 mi SSW Edna Grey Spr., 11S N4019493 E618228, 9037 ft, 28.vi.2004 (D. Skandilis); [BBSL].</p> <p> <b>Paratypes. CANADA:</b> ALBERTA: 1♀ Writing-On-Stone P.P., Sand-North, 18–25.vii.1990 (D. McCorquodale); 1♀ Writing-On-Stone P.P., Grass-South, 8.viii.1990 (M. Klassen); 1♀ Writing-On-Stone P.P., P. T. Sand W., 16–24.viii.1990 (D. McCorquodale); [PMAE]; <b>USA:</b> IDAHO: 1♀ Blaine Co., Ketchum, Sawtooth Botanic Gardens, 1726 m, 24.vi.2007 (Gibbs & Sheffield); [PCYU]; UTAH: 1♀ Washington Co., 0.63 mi NNW Lemmon Spr., 12S N4129346 E33[0?]774, 2.vi.2006 (B. Hays & F. Nicklen); 1♀ Washington Co., 0.75 mi WSW Stave Spr., 12S N4125316 E329919, 9.vi.2006 (B. Hays & F. Nicklen); 1♀ Washington Co., 0.8 mi WSW Stave Spr., 12S N4125286 E329879, 19.vi.2006 (B. Hays & F. Nicklen); 1♀ Washington Co., 0.8 mi WSW Stave Spr., 12S N4125286 E329879, 24.v.2006 (B. Hays & F. Nicklen); [BBSL].</p> <p> <b>Etymology.</b> The specific epithet is a dedication to Andreas W. Ebmer in recognition of his studies of <i>Lasioglossum s.l.</i> and other halictid bees.</p> <p> <b>Floral records.</b> ASTERACEAE: <i>Hymenoxys lemmonii.</i></p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.368
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4120.044

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicCytokine Signaling Pathways and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207