MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6929859976 · doi:10.5255/ukda-sn-7607-2

OECD Banking Statistics, 1979-2009

2020· other· en· W6929859976 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMunich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich) · 2020
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBalance sheetIncome statementCurrencyNational bankEurosCapital (architecture)Capital requirementCurrent accountBalance of payments

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study has been suspended due to a change in platform architecture. We apologise for any inconvenience this may cause. We hope to reinstate this study as soon as possible. The OECD Banking statistics database includes data from 1979 to 2009 on classification of bank assets and liabilities, income statement and balance sheet and structure of the financial system for OECD countries. The OECD have discontinued this dataset, so no further updates will be made. The OECD Banking Statistics are presented in the following tables (some tables will include missing data): Classification of bank assets and liabilities This dataset provides the composition of bank assets and liabilities of residents and non-residents denominated in domestic and foreign currencies based on financial statements of banks in each OECD member country and Russia. Data are reported at current prices in millions of national currency and in millions of Euros for OECD countries. The data covers the years starting from 2005 extending until 2009. The countries covered are Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, Czech Republic, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom, and Russian Federation. Income statement and balance sheet This comparative tables comprises statistics on country’s financial profiles by presenting their respective extensive income statements, balance sheets and capital adequacy by banking group that can be further analyzed by type of financial institution such as commercial banks, savings banks co-operative banks and other monetary institutions. This dataset provides information on income statements, balance sheets and capital adequacy by banking group. Data are reported at current prices in millions of national currency. The data covers the years starting from 1979 extending until 2009. The countries covered are Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States and Russian Federation. Structure of the financial system This dataset provides information on the overall structure of the financial system per country by type of institution and their components: Central banks, other monetary institutions, other financial institutions and insurance institutions. Data relate to number of institutions, number of branches, number of employees, total assets and liabilities and total financial assets. The data covers the years starting from 1979 extending until 2009. The countries covered are Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States and Russian Federation. These data were first provided by the UK Data Service in December 2014.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.150
Threshold uncertainty score0.297

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.022
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0400.053

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMunich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)Same topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207