MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6929866702 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10819235

Data from: ChatGPT performance on radiation technologist and therapist entry to practice exams

2024· dataset· en· W6929866702 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Canadian institutionsHorizon Health NetworkDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiple choiceRadiological weaponData collectionTable (database)Radiation TherapistMedical physicist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dataset contains the data needed to reproduce all results and figures described in "ChatGPT performance on radiation technologist and therapist entry to practice exams". Details about the data collection can be found in the paper referenced below. Briefly, ChatGPT (GPT-4) was prompted with multiple choice questions from 4 practice exams provided by the Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists (CAMRT). ChatGPT was promted with the questions from each exam 5 times between July 17 and August 13, 2023. Table 1, below, provides details about the dates for data collection. Variable descriptions question: Question number, provided by CAMRT. Skipped question numbers indicate image-based questions that were excluded from the study. discipline: Indicates the CAMRT exam discipline, abbreviated as follows RAD: radiological technology MRI: magnetic resonance NUC: nuclear medicine RTT: radiation therapy question_type: Indicates the type of competency being assessed by the question (Knowledge, Application, or Critical thinking). Competency categories were assigned by CAMRT. corrrect_response: The correct multiple choice response ("A", "B", "C", or "D"), assigned by CAMRT. attempt1-5: ChatGPT's response to the multiple choice questions for attempts 1 through 5, indicated using the letters "A", "B", "C", or "D". In a few cases, ChatGPT did not provide a reference to a multiple choice response and "NA" is recorded in the dataset. Note: The long-form questions from CAMRT and answers provided by ChatGPT are not available as a part of this dataset. Table 1: Dates for data collection Attempt 1 Attempt 2 Attempt 3 Attempt 4 Attempt 5 Radiological technology 2 Aug 2023 2 Aug 2023 8 Aug 2023 9 Aug 2023 11 Aug 2023 Magnetic resonance 17 Jul 2023 18 Jul 2023 18 Jul 2023 9 Aug 2023 12 Aug 2023 Nuclear medicine 8 Aug 2023 9 Aug 2023 12 Aug 2023 12 Aug 2023 12 Aug 2023 Radiation therapy 9 Aug 2023 12 Aug 2023 12 Aug 2023 13 Aug 2023 13 Aug 2023

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.037
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score0.330

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.037
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0990.056

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicPneumonia and Respiratory Infections→French-language works237,207→