MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6929883412 · doi:10.5061/dryad.c2fqz6149

Data from: Human-dominated land uses favour species affiliated with more extreme climates, especially in the tropics

2019· dataset· en· W6929883412 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2019
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicGalectins and Cancer Biology
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTropicsTemperate climatePrecipitationAbundance (ecology)Raw dataColumn (typography)Standard deviationLand cover

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The data are derived from the PREDICTS Project database (https://data.nhm.ac.uk/dataset/902f084d-ce3f-429f-a6a5-23162c73fdf7) used within the paper titled "Human-dominated land uses favour species affiliated with more extreme climates, especially in the tropics" (DOI: 10.1111/ecog.04806). If using this data, please make sure that the PREDICTS Project is also cited. For Williams_et_al_Ecography_data_CWM -> These data include, for the species assemblages in the analyses, the raw community weighted means (CWMs) for the extreme (maximum or minimum) and range-wide variation (standard deviations) for each climatic niche property. The columns for the CWMs of the extremes are headed CWM_MAXTmax, CWM_MINTmin, CWM_MAXPpmax and CWM_MINPpmin to match the terms used in the paper. The columns for the CWMs of range-wide variation are headed CWM_STDTmax, CWM_STDTmin, CWM_STDPpmax and CWM_STDPpmin. The columns headed 'Total_abundance' and 'Species_richness' were calculated during data preparation. The other columns included are details about each site, unchanged from the PREDICTS Project database. For Williams_et_al_Ecography_data_Abundance_Tmax_Tropics, Williams_et_al_Ecography_data_Abundance_Tmax_Temperate, Williams_et_al_Ecography_data_Abundance_Ppmin_Tropics and Williams_et_al_Ecography_data_Abundance_Ppmin_Temperate -> These are the data used for the abundance analyses. There are four files within each of these files, one for each species group (formed by splitting around the medians of the exteme and standard deviation of the climatic variable in question, i.e. either maximum temperature of the hottest month or precipitation of the driest month). 'Tropics' or 'Temperate' within the file name denote whether the data are from from tropical or temperate latitudes, respectively. The column headed 'LogAbund' includes the log(x+1) transformation of the abundance measures, used within the models. The columns headed 'Simpson_diversity', 'ChaoR', 'Richness_rarefied', 'UseIntensity' and 'UI' are other variables we calculated along the way, but did not use in these analyses. The column 'LandUse' contains our slight alterations (e.g. changing vegetation to Vegetation) of the 'Predominant_land_use' column found within the PREDICTS Project database. The columns headed 'Total_abundance' and 'Species_richness' were calculated by us using the PREDICTS Project database. The other columns include unchanged species-level data from the PREDICTS Project database.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicGalectins and Cancer BiologyFrench-language works237,207