Bibliographic record
Abstract
20. Acalypha humbertii Leandri Notulae Systematicae. Herbier du Muséum de Paris. Phanérogramie. Paris 10: 274 (Leandri 1942). — Type: Madagascar. Prov. Toliara, vallées du Mangoky et de l’Isahaina, aux environs de Beroroha, 200 m, X.1933, H. Humbert 11289 (lecto-, designated byMontero Muñoz et al. [2018a: 99]: P [P00508400]; isolecto-, P [P00508399]). — Former syntypes: Madagascar. Prov. Toliara, Bassin supérieur de Mandrare du Sud-Est, entre le col de Vavara et la vallée de la Manambolo, 700-1200 m, 20-22.XII.1928, H. Humbert 6758 (P [P00508401, P00508402, P00508403, P00508404]). ICONOGRAPHY. — Fig. 35G. ETYMOLOGY. — The epithet honors French botanist Henri [JeanHenri] Humbert (1887-1967). DISTRIBUTION AND HABITAT. — Endemic to Madagascar (Menabe, Atsimo-Andrefana, Androy, and Anosy). Dry deciduous forest and dry spiny thickets. On basement rocks and sandstone. Altitudinal range (50-) 200-800 (-1000) m (Fig. 36). PRELIMINARY CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT. — The EOO of Acalypha humbertii is estimated to be 37 244 km 2 and its AOO 20 km 2, which is less than the 500 km 2 threshold of the B2 subcriterion of the Endangered category. This species grows mainly in dry deciduous forest and spiny thickets (see assessment in A. decaryana). The remaining original vegetation is still decreasing. Due to its small AOO, the small number of locations (5), and ongoing habitat loss, Acalypha humbertii is assessed as Endangered: EN B2ab(ii,iii,iv). MATERIAL EXAMINED. — 11 collections. Madagascar: Bosser, M.J. 10234 (P[P00324559]); Decary, R. 15637 (P[P00324536, P05510104]); Humbert, H. 6758 (P[P00508401, P00508402, P00508403, P00508404]), 11289 (P[P00508399, P00508400]); Jongkind, C.C.H. 3708 (MO, TAN, WAG[WAG.1578689]); Kaudern, W. 222 (S[S17-37631]), 289 (S[S17-37632]); Leandri, J. 3532 (P[P00324507, P05543682]), 3535 (P[P05547075]), 3882 (P[P00324510]), 3900 (P[P00324511, P05543681]). REFERENCES. — Govaerts et al. (2000: 67); Montero Muñoz et al. (2018a: 99). DESCRIPTION Shrubs, deciduous, to 1.5 m tall, highly divaricately branched, monoecious. Branches densely pubescent to subvelutinous, glabrescent when mature. Axillary buds subfusiform, to 4 × 2 mm, perulate, perules 2, imbricate, chartaceous, dark brown, glabrous. Stipules to 3 mm long, linear, densely pubescent. Petioles 0.5-1.5 long, indumentum similar to that on young branches. Leaf blades 2.4-3.7 × 1.4-2.6 cm, ovate-lanceolate to elliptic-lanceolate, subchartaceous; base rounded to subacute; apex rounded to subacuminate, acumen to 2 mm long, rounded; margin crenate-serrate, teeth rounded, callose-edged; upper and lower surfaces velutinous with simple, short trichomes; venation actinodromous, basal veins 3, secondary veins 4-5 per side. Stipels absent. Inflorescences spiciform, androgynous, axillary, to 3 cm long, mostly male with 1 female bract at base; peduncle to 5 mm long, it and rachis pubescent with simple, short trichomes. Female segment: bract 1, sessile, enlarging in fruit to 6 × 8 mm, reniform, pubescent with simple, short trichomes; margin subentire to irregularly dentate, teeth c. 13, triangular, central tooth not prominent; bracteoles to 0.8 mm long, oblong-lanceolate, sparsely hairy. Male segment persistent, to 1.8 cm long; flowers glomerate; bracts to 0.5 mm long, triangular, sparsely hairy. Male flowers: pedicel to 0.6 mm long, sparsely hairy; buds not seen. Female flowers 1 per bract, sessile; sepals 3, to 0.7 mm long, ovate-lanceolate, ciliate; ovary c. 1 mm diameter, 3-lobed, echinate, projections linear, to 1.5 mm long, surface hispid with simple, rigid trichomes; styles 3, to 3.5 mm long, connate at base, sparsely hairy with simple, long, appressed trichomes at rachis, each divided into c. 8 segments. Allomorphic flowers not seen. Capsules to 2.5 mm diameter, echinate, projections linear, to 1.5 mm long, surface hispid with simple, rigid trichomes. Seeds c. 1.5 × 1.2 mm, pyriform, minutely foveolate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".