The Concept of Life Purpose in the Qur’an Surah adz-Dzariyat Verse 56 and its Relevance to The Quarter Life Crisis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The phenomenon of quarter life crisis is increasingly prevalent among young Muslims in the digital age, which is fraught with demands for success, career uncertainty, and social pressure, causing existential anxiety and identity confusion. This study aims to explain the meaning of life purpose contained in the Qur'an Surah adz-Dzariyat verse 56 and its relevance to this phenomenon. The research method used is qualitative with a thematic interpretation approach. Data was obtained through literature review covering classical tafsir texts such as Ibn Katsir and al-Qurthubi, as well as modern tafsir works such as those by Quraish Shihab. Additionally, this study utilizes references from developmental psychology and logotherapy theories to enrich the discussion. The results of the study indicate that the concept of worship in the Qur'an Surah adz-Dzariyat verse 56 has a broad meaning, encompassing all aspects of human life aimed at seeking Allah's pleasure. This verse provides existential guidance for the younger generation in finding a clear, stable, and meaningful direction in life, thereby serving as a spiritual solution to the quarter-life crisis. The implications of this study are the need to strengthen spiritual literacy and contextual da'wah to help the younger generation deal with identity crises from a more transcendental perspective.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it