MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6930025632 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.11127160

Dasydorylas colombiensis Ramos-Pastrana & Marques & Rafael 2024, sp. nov.

2024· article· en· W6930025632 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicroRNA in disease regulation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeApex (geometry)SetaDorsumPhallus (fungus)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dasydorylas colombiensis sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: BD492866-DC5C-4892-9C54-7FD75B6CA0F7 Figs 1–13, 53 Diagnosis Postpedicel with aristiform apex. Tergites 1–5 brown, brown pruinose, with distal margin gray pruinose dorsolaterally, interrupted medially. Surstyli subsymmetrical, slightly shorter than epandrium; both surstyli thickened basally and medially, thin apically, with inner margins slightly straight, outer margin curved, and apices acute inward-directed in dorsal view; left surstylus with apex sinuous, right surstylus with apex truncated in lateral view. Apex of phallic guide with upper margin slightly sinuous and a tuft of small setae centrally in lateral view. Phallus trifid, with ejaculatory ducts distinctly separated only in distal half. Etymology The species name refers to Colombia, where holotype has been collected. Type material Holotype COLOMBIA – Boyacá • ♂; “ SFF[Santuario de Fauna y Flora] Iguaque, Cab.[Cabaña] Mamaramos; 05°25′ N, 73°27′ W; 2855 m [eters]; 13.Nov [XI]– 04.Dic [XII].2001; P. Reina leg.”; IAvH M1063 (photographed specimen). Holotype with left wing mounted on microslide with Canada balsam. Left antenna and terminalia are in a microvial with glycerine, pinned along with the specimen. Paratypes COLOMBIA – Boyacá • 2 ♂♂; “ SFF[Santuario de Fauna y Flora] Iguaque, Cab.[Cabaña] Mamaramos; 05°25′ N, 73°26′ W; 23.Sep [IX]– 11.Oct. [X].2000”; IAvH (1 ♂ dissected) • 1 ♂; idem; “ 01–17. Aug [VIII].2000; (IAvH) • 1 ♂; idem; “ 04–21.Dec [X].2001”; IAvH M1080 • 1 ♂; idem; “ 05°25′12″ N, 73°27′24″ W; Malaise4; 01–19.IV.2000 ”; IAvH (dissected). Description Male (holotype) MEASUREMENTS. Body length 3.4 mm, Wing length 4.9 mm. HEAD (Figs 1–2). Eyes contiguous for 19 facets. F, EM, V (mm) = 0.3, 0.4, 0.1. Frontal triangle dark brown, brown pruinose, with callus shiny dark brown. Occiput dark brown, gray pruinose ventrally and laterally, brown pruinose dorsally. Antenna (Fig. 3) scape and pedicel dark brown, pedicel with three setae dorsally and two ventrally; postpedicel with aristiform apex. LPP/WPP = 5.1. THORAX (Figs 1–2, 4). Postpronotal lobe brown, brown pruinose, with six long setae along upper margin. Scutum, ground color brown, brown pruinose, with two gray pruinose spots anterolaterally; dorsocentral setae conspicuous. Notopleuron brown, gray-brown pruinose. Scutellum brown, brown pruinose, with 10 long, stout and black setae in the posterior margin. Mesopleuron and mediotergite concolorous with notopleuron. WING. LW/MWW = 3.1; LTC/LFC = 5.6. Membrane brown infuscated; vein M 1 slightly curved upward. Halter stem and knob completely beige ventrally, brown dorsally, except beige in medial third of stem. LEGS (Fig. 1). Coxae dark brown, gray-brown pruinose; trochanters brown, gray-brown pruinose; femora brown, gray-brown pruinose, except yellowish brown apices, femora with conspicuous ctenidia and a row of long setae anterolaterally and posterolaterally; tibiae brown, except yellowish brown in basal third; tarsomeres 1–4 brown, 5 dark brown; pulvilli yellowish brown. ABDOMEN (Figs 1–2, 6). Ground color velvety brown, with conspicuous scattered setae; tergites 1–5 brown, brown pruinose, with distal margin gray pruinose dorsolaterally, interrupted medially; tergite 1 with five black and long setae laterally; tergites and sternites 6 and 7 as in Fig. 7. Syntergosternite 8 dark brown, gray-brown pruinose, shorter than tergite 5, with a membranous area apically (Fig. 6). TERMINALIA (Figs 7–13). Epandrium and surstyli brown (Fig. 8). Surstyli (Figs 8–10) subsymmetrical, slightly shorter than epandrium, with some differentiated black setae scattered dorsally in dorsal view. Both surstyli thickened basally and medially, thin apically, with inner margins slightly straight, outer margin curved, and apices acute inward-directed in dorsal view; right surstylus slightly shorter than left (Fig. 8); left surstylus with apex sinuous, right surstylus with apex truncated in lateral view (Figs 9–10). Gonopods asymmetrical, right gonopod slightly thicker than left in ventral view (Fig. 11). Apex of phallic guide stout, with apex hook-shaped, upper margin slightly sinuous, with a tuft of small setae dorsocentrally in lateral view (Fig. 12). Ejaculatory apodeme parasol-shaped (Fig. 13). Phallus trifid, thin, with ejaculatory ducts distinctly separated only in distal half (Figs 11–12). Female Unknown. Geographical distribution Colombia (Boyacá) (Fig. 53). Habitat The specimens were collected in the Santuario de Fauna y Flora Iguaque reserve, where the vegetation is composed of cloud Andean forests of the cordillera of the Northeast region of Colombia. Remarks Based on males and due to the shape of the surstyli, D. colombiensis sp. nov. (Fig. 8) is similar in appearance to D. gibber sp. nov. (Fig. 21) but differs from the latter in having the tergites 1–5 brown, brown pruinose, with distal margin gray pruinose dorsolaterally, slightly interrupted medially (Figs 1–2, 6) (vs tergite 1 completely brown pruinose; tergites 2–4 with distal margins yellowish brown pruinose; tergite 5 dark brown, brown pruinose dorsally, yellowish brown pruinose laterally in D. gibber sp. nov.; Figs 14–15, 19); left surstylus with apex sinuous in lateral view (Fig. 9) (vs left surstylus with apex slightly rounded in lateral view; Fig. 22); apex of phallic guide with upper margin slightly sinuous and tuft of small setae dorsocentrally (Fig. 12) (vs apex of phallic guide with a translucid lobes lateroapically and a stout rigid lobe dorsally; Fig. 25); phallus with ejaculatory ducts distinctly separated only in distal half (Fig. 12) (vs phallus with ejaculatory ducts distinctly separated only in distal fifth; Fig. 25).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.094

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicMicroRNA in disease regulation→French-language works237,207→