MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6930060630 · doi:10.5061/dryad.wm37pvmwx

Freshwater life-cycle timing of Pacific salmon and steelhead (Oncorhynchus spp.) in Canada

2024· dataset· en· W6930060630 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDRYAD · 2024
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHabitatTroutJuvenileFish migrationClimate changeMarine habitatsFreshwater fishLife historyEndangered species

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding species’ phenology and distribution is essential for mitigating anthropogenic disturbances and understanding climate change vulnerability. Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) have complex life cycles that span freshwater and marine environments and unfold over many thousands of kilometers. Currently, there is no central repository of life-cycle timing for unique salmon and steelhead populations throughout their Canadian range. We have compiled a dataset of timing for key freshwater life-cycle events - fry migration from incubation to rearing grounds, juvenile migration from rearing grounds to the ocean, adult entry into rivers, and spawning - for salmon and steelhead trout from British Columbia and the Yukon, Canada. We summarize patterns across species and populations to improve understanding of when species are in different freshwater habitats but found significant data gaps in remote regions that may challenge environmental planning. The data and insight we provide allow for more detailed examination of how salmon and steelhead populations will be exposed to future climate changes and can be used to inform adaptive management of fisheries and mitigation during human development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDRYADFrench-language works237,207