Lepturges (Lepturges) vigneaulti Audureau 2018
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lepturges (Lepturges) vigneaulti Audureau, 2018 (Figs 4–8) Lepturges (Lepturges) vigneaulti Audureau, 2018: 19; Monné, 2024: 135. Lepturges (Lepturges) brechlini Santos-Silva et al., 2019: 447; Monné, 2024: 124 (cat.). Syn. nov. Remarks. Lepturges (Lepturges) Bates, 1863 includes 88 species distributed from Canada to southern South America (Roguet 2023). We are considering Lepturges (Lepturges) brechlini Santos-Silva et al., 2019 as a junior synonym of L. (L.) vigneaulti Audureau, 2018. Lepturges (Lepturges) vigneaulti was described based on a single male from Nicaragua (Bezark 2024b; Monné 2024; Tavakilian & Chevillotte 2023). One year later, Santos-Silva et al. (2019) described L. (L.) brechlini based on a single male from Panama. The study of two males from Panama (Figs 4–5) and a female from Nicaragua (Figs 6–7) allows us to conclude that L. (L.) brechlini (Fig. 8) is a junior synonym of L. (L.) vigneaulti (see photographs in Santos-Silva et al. 2019, Bezark 2023 a, and Audureau 2018), with extreme variation in the elytral pubescent pattern. The female of L. (L.) vigneaulti (Figs 6–7) differs from males by the antennae being slightly shorter, the mesofemoral club slender (stouter in males), and by the last abdominal segment almost as long as the two previous segments together (about as long as the previous segment in males). Material examined. NICARAGUA, Nueva Segovia: Cerro Jesus, 8 km N Jalapa, 1,100-1,200 m, 13°58'N 86°10'W, 1 female, 12-20.V.2017, Wappes, Kuckartz & van den Berghe leg. (FSCA). PANAMA, Ngäbe-Buglé: Fortuna Cabins, 8.7794°N 82.1911°W, 1 male, 5-11.IX.2021, E.G. Riley leg. (DHCO); 8.7814°N 82.1909°W, 27.IV-4.V.2023, 1 male, B.T. Raber leg. (DHCO).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".