MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6930109364 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10406190

Scipopus (Parascipopus) Lindsay & Marshall 2023, subgen. nov.

2023· article· en· W6930109364 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaSubgenusTaxonomy (biology)AppendageCharacter (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scipopus (Parascipopus) subgen. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 75B16026-19C0-4736-9B53-7C2715029568 Type species Calobata manifesta Wulp, 1897: 370. Diagnosis Scipopus (Parascipopus) is differentiated from other subgenera in Scipopus s. lat. by a shiny, clearly delineated orbital plate and a strongly tapered anterior frontal vitta (except in S. (Pa.) fenestratus sp. nov., the most basal species of the group, which can be recognized by the absence of the apical scutellar seta, a character state only occurring in some species of S. (Parascipopus) and not found elsewhere in Scipopus s. lat.). The single spermathecal duct arises from a rugose common spermathecal duct extending beyond the bursa copulatrix, or from the side of a smooth paired duct. The distal distiphallus is usually long and narrow but is absent in S. (Pa.) alturas sp. nov. Scipopus (Phaeopterina) fraudator sp. nov. has all of the external diagnostic character states of S. (Parascipopus) but is resolved as S. (Phaeopterina) on a molecular phylogeny and differs from S. (Parascipopus) by the single and paired spermathecal ducts arising separately from the bursa. This species can be further distinguished from similar species of S. (Parascipopus) by the presence of apical scutellar setae and other characters in the key. Description LENGTH. 10–15 mm. COLOUR. Varies widely between species. HEAD. Antenna orange to black. Palpus narrow or wide (length 3.0–5.0× height) and nearly parallel-sided, rounded or pointed apically, setulose and pale microtrichose. Clypeus short, 1.7–2.4× as wide as high, orange and/or brown, or black, white microtrichose on entire surface. Frontal vitta dull microtrichose, strongly pointed or ending in a rounded point posteriorly (Fig. 43D) (except in S. (Pa.) fenestratus sp. nov.); orbital plate shiny and clearly delineated (Fig. 43A) (except in S. (Pa.) fenestratus). Epicephalon shiny, wide (width ⅔ or more of upper frontal vitta width at inner verticals), clearly delineated from upper frontal vitta, bare. Paracephalon shiny. Head chaetotaxy always including inner vertical, postocellar, and 1–2 lower fronto-orbital setae; outer vertical and upper fronto-orbital setae present or absent. THORAX. Mesothorax tapered anteriorly. Thorax stout or elongate (length/height ≥ 0.93). Cervical sclerite subquadrate, often slightly convex. Anterior edge of mesonotum vertical, scutum relatively flat (Fig. 39F). Postpronotal lobe distinct, raised, approximately parallelogram-shape, elongate (length ~3.0–4.0 × height). Scutellum with or without two long, strong apical setae (2.0× length of scutellum) and 0–3 pairs of short, lateral discal setulae. WING. Uniformly black-brown infuscate, or with preapical hyaline spots, or hyaline with apical and/or discal infuscation. ABDOMEN (J+ ♀). T1 with fine, white, yellow, black or dark brown setae, remainder of abdomen with short dark brown or black setulae. Pleuron orange, off-white or pale grey, usually with darker orange or dark brown on dorsal half of P2–6. FEMALE ABDOMEN. T1+2 2.2–3.0× length of T3. Oviscape variable in dimensions but tapered distally, sparsely covered in short black setulae and white microtrichose basally. Common spermathecal duct arising from apex of bursa, roughly textured and ranging from very short (⅛ of entire duct length) (Fig. 38C) to long (½ of entire duct length) (Fig. 36A), clearly delineated from paired duct. Paired spermathecal duct smooth, usually narrow (Fig. 39E), strongly swollen distally in S. (Pa.) kubus sp. nov. (Fig. 38C). Paired spermathecal stem usually swollen, often sinuate, limit between end of stem and beginning of spermatheca usually not clearly delineated. Single spermathecal duct arising from either base or distal half of common duct, or base of paired duct, smooth and narrow, swollen distally, single spermatheca usually smaller than paired, bulb- or finger-like. MALE ABDOMEN. T1+2 1.4–3.0 × length of T3. Genital fork arm with inner basal process, length and shape of arm and process variable. Epandrium elongate (length ~2.0 × height). Basiphallus small, usually frame-like or crescent-shaped when viewed ventrally. Basal distiphallus very short (⅓ epandrium length) to long (≈ epandrium length), ending in phallic bulb. Phallic bulb approximately round and small (Fig. 42E) to large and irregular or ovoid (Fig. 41E). Distal distiphallus (absent in S. (Pa.) alturas sp. nov.) short to long, usually narrow (Fig. 43E). Phallapodeme narrow or broad, usually expanded apically (Fig. 36D). Ejaculatory apodeme varying in size, usually with a fan-like apodeme attached to a bulbous sperm pump (Fig. 36D).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.141 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy→French-language works237,207→