Fig. 4 in First North American occurrence of hairy cicadas discovered in the Cenomanian (Late Cretaceous) of Labrador, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fig. 4. Comparison of hairy cicada Maculaferrum blaisi gen. et sp. nov. (holotype RMIP 2018.18.24) from the Cenomanian (Late Cretaceous) Redmond Formation, Labrador, Canada, with forewings of extant relatives (B, C). A. Interpretative drawing of M. blaisi gen. et sp. nov. (holotype RMIP 2018.18.24) in pre-burial state, based on extant and extinct relatives. B. Left forewing of male Tettigarcta crinita Distant, 1883 from southern Victoria, Australia; NMV HEM5660 in dorsal view. C. Left forewing of female Tettigarcta tomentosa White, 1845 from Tasmania, Australia; NMV HEM476 in dorsal view. Note colouration pattern on post-nodal half: round patches near junction of terminal longitudinal veins with ambient vein, a larger darker round patch in cell a2, smaller irregular patches along more basal segments of longitudinal veins, and large oblong to irregular patches along cross veins and short segment of M1. Abbreviations: A, anal vein; a, apical cell; av, ambient vein; bc, basal cell; C, costa; Cu, cubitus; CuA, cubitus anterior; CuP, cubitus posterior; M, media; M1+2, two anterior branches of M; M3+4, two posterior branches of M; m, medial cross vein; mc, medial cell; m-cua, mediocubital cross vein; RA, radius anterior; RP, radius posterior; r, radial cross vein; r-m, radio-medial cross vein; Sc, subcosta; u, ulnar cell.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".