Telonema subtilis Griessmann 1913
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Telonema subtilis Griessmann 1913 (Fig. 4m) Observation: Cell outline is oval-ovoid. Cells are about 8 µm long, anteriorly narrow and posteriorly broad with a short anterior neck. Two flagella insert below the neck, and are acronematic and slightly longer than the cell. The nucleus is centrally located. The cells swim backward with the flagella, which point behind the swimming cells. Food materials are shown in the posterior end of the cell. Not common. Three cells were observed. Remarks: The observations are in accord with Griessmann (1913). This species has been found at marine sites in France, Mediterranean, Arctic Norway, Australia, Arctic Canada, Greenland, Japan, Belize and Gulf of Finland (Grieessmann 1913; Hollande and Cachon 1950; Throndson 1969, 1983; Vørs 1992a, b, 1993a, b; Patterson et al. 1993; Tong et al. 1998; Vørs et al. 1995; Lee et al. 2003), and has also been reported from a freshwater site in the Antarctic (Tong et al. 1997). Previously cell lengths were observed to be 4 to 18 µm. Ultrastructural studies were conducted by Vørs (1992a) and Yabuki et al. (2013). This species is distinguished from Telonema antarctica Thomsen in Vørs 1992 by the cell shape. Telonema antarctica is reniforme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".